Jaguszewski Milosz, Ciecwierz Dariusz, Gilis-Malinowska Natasza, Fijalkowski Marcin, Targonski Radoslaw, Masiewicz Emilia, Strozyk Aneta, Duda Maciej, Chmielecki Michal, Lewicki Lukasz, Dubaniewicz Witold, Burakowski Slawomir, Drewla Piotr, Skarzynski Pawel, Rynkiewicz Andrzej, Alibegovic Jasmina, Landmesser Ulf, Gruchala Marcin
Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland.
Department of Cardiology, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charite, Berlin, Germany.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Aug;86(2):E49-57. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25841. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
The effectiveness of revascularization of chronic total occlusion (CTO) remains intriguing. Thus, we sought to investigate whether a successful PCI for single CTO improves outcomes in a setting of stable angina and chronic occlusion of single coronary artery.
Of 11 957 consecutive patients referred for nonurgent PCI between 2003 and 2010, 1110 displayed single CTO and were enrolled to the central CTO-registry database. The primary end-point included all-cause mortality, the secondary end-point a composite of safety outcome measure of all-cause death, nonfatal-MI, the need for urgent revascularization and stroke. The major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) records were extracted from the national administrative database and all patients were linked to the long-term follow-up. Since the patient assignment was not random, we performed the propensity scoring to minimize selection bias; 734 patients (66%) had a successful PCI-CTO. Compared with successful procedures, unsuccessful procedures had similar rates of all-cause death both in crude (HR, 0.78; 95%CI, 0.49-1.25; P = 0.30) and adjusted analysis (HR, 0.80; 95%CI, 0.50-1.28; P = 0.34). A similar, significant reduction in overall MACE was noted with successful PCI-CTO compared with unsuccessful procedure in unadjusted (HR, 0.74; 95%CI, 0.56-0.96; P = 0.020) and adjusted calculation (HR, 0.73; 95%CI, 0.56-0.96; P = 0.019). Patients after successful PCI-CTO as compared with failed recanalization less frequently underwent surgical revascularization. The benefit was sustained at 3 years follow-up.
Successful PCI for single CTO does not improve long-term survival, nonetheless, is associated with reduced overall MACE and the need for surgical revascularization.
慢性完全闭塞病变(CTO)血运重建的有效性仍存在争议。因此,我们试图研究单支CTO病变成功进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)是否能改善稳定型心绞痛和单支冠状动脉慢性闭塞患者的预后。
在2003年至2010年间连续接受非紧急PCI治疗的11957例患者中,1110例表现为单支CTO病变,并被纳入中央CTO注册数据库。主要终点包括全因死亡率,次要终点为全因死亡、非致死性心肌梗死、紧急血运重建需求和卒中的综合安全结局指标。主要不良心血管事件(MACE)记录从国家行政数据库中提取,所有患者均进行长期随访。由于患者分配并非随机,我们进行倾向评分以尽量减少选择偏倚;734例患者(66%)成功进行了CTO-PCI。与成功手术相比,未成功手术在粗分析(风险比[HR],0.78;95%置信区间[CI],0.49-1.25;P = 0.30)和校正分析(HR,0.80;95%CI,0.50-1.28;P = 0.34)中的全因死亡率相似。与未成功手术相比,成功的CTO-PCI在未校正(HR,0.74;95%CI,0.56-0.96;P = 0.020)和校正计算(HR,0.73;95%CI,0.56-0.96;P = 0.019)中总体MACE有类似的显著降低。与再通失败相比,成功进行CTO-PCI的患者较少接受外科血运重建。这种益处持续到3年随访。
单支CTO病变成功进行PCI并不能改善长期生存率,尽管如此,它与总体MACE降低及外科血运重建需求减少相关。