Suppr超能文献

在 Trial Evaluating Cardiovascular Outcomes with Sitagliptin(TECOS)研究中,纳入患者的基线特征存在地域、年龄和性别差异。

Regional, age and sex differences in baseline characteristics of patients enrolled in the Trial Evaluating Cardiovascular Outcomes with Sitagliptin (TECOS).

机构信息

Diabetes Trials Unit, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 Apr;17(4):395-402. doi: 10.1111/dom.12441. Epub 2015 Feb 13.

Abstract

AIMS

To report baseline characteristics and cardiovascular (CV) risk management by region, age, sex and CV event type for 14 724 participants in the Trial Evaluating Cardiovascular Outcomes with Sitagliptin (TECOS), a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial exploring whether sitagliptin added to usual type 2 diabetes (T2DM) care affects time to first event in the composite endpoint of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), non-fatal stroke or unstable angina hospitalization.

METHODS

TECOS enrolled patients aged ≥50 years, with T2DM and CV disease from 38 countries in five regions: North America, Eastern Europe, Western Europe, Asia Pacific and Latin America. Participants had a glycated haemoglobin concentration of 6.5-8.0% (48-64 mmol/mol) and were receiving oral and/or insulin-based antihyperglycaemic therapy. Analysis of variance or logistic regression was used to compare regional CV risk factors and treatments, referenced to North America.

RESULTS

Patients had a mean [1 standard deviation (SD)] age of 66 (8) years, a median (interquartile range) diabetes duration of 9.4 (4.9, 15.3) years, and a mean (SD) body mass index 30.2 (5.7) kg/m² . Compared with North America, blood pressure and lipids were higher in all regions. Statin use was lowest in Latin America (68%) and Eastern Europe (70%) and aspirin use was lower compared with North America in all regions except Asia Pacific. Achievement of treatment targets did not differ by age group or insulin usage, but men and participants with previous MI were more likely than women or those with previous stroke or peripheral arterial disease to reach most treatment goals.

CONCLUSION

The CV risk factors of participants in TECOS are reasonably controlled, but differences in CV risk management according to region, sex and history of disease exist. This diversity will enhance the generalizability of the trial results.

摘要

目的

报告 14724 例参与评估西格列汀心血管结局试验(TECOS)的患者的基线特征和心血管(CV)风险管理情况,这些患者按地区、年龄、性别和 CV 事件类型进行分组,该试验为一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,旨在探讨与常规 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)治疗相比,加用西格列汀是否会影响 CV 死亡、非致死性心肌梗死(MI)、非致死性卒中和不稳定型心绞痛住院复合终点的首次事件时间。

方法

TECOS 纳入了来自五个地区(北美洲、东欧、西欧、亚太地区和拉丁美洲)38 个国家年龄≥50 岁、合并 CV 疾病的患者。患者的糖化血红蛋白浓度为 6.5-8.0%(48-64mmol/mol),并接受口服和/或胰岛素为基础的降糖治疗。采用方差分析或逻辑回归比较各地区的 CV 危险因素和治疗方法,以北美地区为参照。

结果

患者的平均(1 个标准差)年龄为 66(8)岁,中位(四分位间距)糖尿病病程为 9.4(4.9,15.3)年,平均(标准差)体重指数为 30.2(5.7)kg/m²。与北美地区相比,所有地区的血压和血脂均较高。拉丁美洲(68%)和东欧(70%)的他汀类药物使用率最低,除亚太地区外,所有地区的阿司匹林使用率均低于北美地区。年龄组或胰岛素使用情况对治疗目标的达标率没有影响,但与女性或有既往卒中和外周动脉疾病史的患者相比,男性和有既往 MI 史的患者更有可能达到大多数治疗目标。

结论

TECOS 参与者的 CV 危险因素得到了较好的控制,但根据地区、性别和疾病史的不同,CV 管理方法存在差异。这种多样性将提高试验结果的普遍性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验