Orucevic Amila, Chen Jason, McLoughlin James M, Heidel Robert E, Panella Timothy, Bell John
Department of Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tennessee Medical Center at Knoxville, Knoxville, Tennessee.
Breast J. 2015 Mar-Apr;21(2):147-54. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12367. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
We have previously demonstrated that TNM status and age were significant predictors of overall survival (OS) in our study population of Caucasian patients with invasive breast carcinoma (2000-2004 study period). However, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) biomarker expression was not predictive of OS when using the five-group ER/PR/HER2 subtype classification system recommended by St. Gallen International Consensus Panel in 2011. The current study reassessed the relevance of tumor biomarkers (ER/PR/HER2) in our study population using a recently proposed biologic TNM (bTNM) classification system in which the inclusion of triple negative ER/PR/HER2 phenotype (TNP) could improve the prognostic accuracy of TNM for staging, prognosis and treatment of breast cancer patients. Seven hundred eighty-two Caucasian women diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma from 1998 to 2008 were grouped according to their TNM stage and TNP versus non-TNP ER/PR/HER2 phenotype. OS was measured comparing these categories using Kaplan Meier curves and Cox regression analysis. TNM stage (Stage II = HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.01-1.97; Stage III = HR 3.96, 95% CI 2.68-5.88; Stage IV = HR 27.25, 95% CI 16.84-44.08), and age (HR 1.05, 95% CI 1.04-1.06) were significant predictors of OS. TNP significantly worsened prognosis/survival only in higher TNM stages (Stage III = HR 3.08, 95% CI 1.88-5.04, Stage IV = HR 24.36, 95% CI 13.81-42.99), but not in lower stages (I and II). Our data support the traditional TNM staging as a continued relevant predictive tool for breast cancer outcomes and show that biomarkers primarily improve the accuracy of TNM staging in advanced stages of breast cancer. We suspect that type of ER/PR/HER2 classification system(s) (St. Gallen, TNP, etc.), characteristics of populations studied (Caucasians, minorities, etc.), and the time period chosen for a study are major factors that determine impact of biomarkers on the prognostic accuracy of TNM. We propose systematic analyses of these factors before biomarkers are fully incorporated into the TNM staging system (bTNM).
我们先前已证明,在我们研究的2000 - 2004年期间的白种人浸润性乳腺癌患者群体中,TNM分期和年龄是总生存期(OS)的重要预测指标。然而,当使用圣加伦国际共识小组在2011年推荐的五组ER/PR/HER2亚型分类系统时,雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)和表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)生物标志物表达并不能预测OS。本研究使用最近提出的生物TNM(bTNM)分类系统重新评估了我们研究群体中肿瘤生物标志物(ER/PR/HER2)的相关性,该系统纳入三阴性ER/PR/HER2表型(TNP)可提高TNM对乳腺癌患者分期、预后和治疗的预后准确性。将1998年至2008年诊断为浸润性导管癌的782名白种女性根据其TNM分期以及TNP与非TNP的ER/PR/HER2表型进行分组。使用Kaplan - Meier曲线和Cox回归分析比较这些类别来测量OS。TNM分期(II期 = HR 1.41,95% CI 1.01 - 1.97;III期 = HR 3.96,95% CI 2.68 - 5.88;IV期 = HR 27.25,95% CI 16.84 - 44.08)和年龄(HR 1.05,95% CI 1.04 - 1.06)是OS的重要预测指标。TNP仅在较高TNM分期(III期 = HR 3.08,95% CI 1.88 - 5.04,IV期 = HR 24.36,95% CI 13.81 - 42.99)中显著恶化预后/生存期,但在较低分期(I期和II期)中并非如此。我们的数据支持传统TNM分期作为乳腺癌预后的持续相关预测工具,并表明生物标志物主要提高了乳腺癌晚期TNM分期的准确性。我们怀疑ER/PR/HER2分类系统的类型(圣加伦、TNP等)、所研究人群的特征(白种人、少数族裔等)以及研究选择的时间段是决定生物标志物对TNM预后准确性影响的主要因素。我们建议在将生物标志物完全纳入TNM分期系统(bTNM)之前对这些因素进行系统分析。