Suppr超能文献

用于检验对结直肠癌筛查影响的分类树分析。

Classification tree analysis to examine influences on colorectal cancer screening.

作者信息

Dominick Gregory M, Papas Mia A, Rogers Michelle L, Rakowski William

机构信息

Department of Behavioral Health and Nutrition, University of Delaware, 26 North College Avenue, Newark, DE, 19716, USA,

出版信息

Cancer Causes Control. 2015 Mar;26(3):443-54. doi: 10.1007/s10552-015-0523-6. Epub 2015 Jan 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Identifying correlates of colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) is critical for cancer control and prevention. Classification tree analysis (CTA) is a potentially powerful analytic tool that can identify distinct population subgroups for which CRCS is influenced by any number of multivariable interactions. This study used CTA to identify correlates of CRCS for exclusive population subgroups.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) and analyzed in 2014. CTA was employed to determine the association between demographic (n = 11), psychosocial (n = 6), and numeracy (n = 3) variables and CRCS status of adults ≥50 years (n = 3,769).

RESULTS

Overall CRCS rate was 66.9 %. Level of doctor avoidance (three categories) was the initial splitting variable, leading to a total of 21 terminal node subgroups of CRCS utilization: (1) avoid doctor, not for fear of illness/death [n = 625 (16.5 %), four subgroups]; (2) avoid doctor, fear illness/death [n = 366 (9.7 %), two subgroups]; (3) do not avoid doctor [n = 2,778 (73.7 %), 15 subgroups].

CONCLUSIONS

Doctor avoidance was an important behavioral influence on CRCS adherence. Use of CTA to identify unique characteristics within population subgroups has merit for tailoring future intervention strategies. Community-based approaches may be effective for reaching individuals who avoid routine doctor visits.

摘要

目的

确定结直肠癌筛查(CRCS)的相关因素对于癌症控制和预防至关重要。分类树分析(CTA)是一种潜在的强大分析工具,它可以识别出不同的人群亚组,在这些亚组中,CRCS受到多种多变量相互作用的影响。本研究使用CTA来确定特定人群亚组中CRCS的相关因素。

方法

数据来自2007年健康信息国家趋势调查(HINTS),并于2014年进行分析。采用CTA来确定人口统计学变量(n = 11)、心理社会变量(n = 6)和算术能力变量(n = 3)与50岁及以上成年人(n = 3,769)的CRCS状态之间的关联。

结果

总体CRCS率为66.9%。避免看医生的程度(分为三类)是初始分割变量,导致CRCS利用率共有21个终末节点亚组:(1)避免看医生,并非因恐惧疾病/死亡[n = 625(16.5%),四个亚组];(2)避免看医生,恐惧疾病/死亡[n = 366(9.7%),两个亚组];(3)不避免看医生[n = 2,778(73.7%),15个亚组]。

结论

避免看医生是对CRCS依从性的一个重要行为影响因素。使用CTA来识别群体亚组中的独特特征,对于制定未来的干预策略具有价值。基于社区的方法可能对接触那些避免常规看医生的个体有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验