Ye Yulin, Zamalloa Carlos, Lin Hongjian, Yan Mi, Schmidt David, Hu Bo
a Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering , University of Minnesota , St. Paul , Minnesota , USA.
J Environ Sci Health B. 2015;50(3):217-27. doi: 10.1080/03601234.2015.982432.
The introduction of food wastes into anaerobic digestion (AD) brings a promising scenario of increasing feedstock availability and overall energy production from AD. This study evaluated the biodegradability and methane potential from co-digestion of two typical food wastes, kitchen waste and chicken fat, with dairy manure. For single substrate, the bio-methane potential assays showed that kitchen waste had the highest methane yield of 352 L-CH4 kg(-1)-VS added, 92% more than dairy manure alone. Chicken fat at the same Volatile Solid (VS) level (2 g L(-1)) inhibited bio-methane production. Addition of kitchen waste and chicken fat to a VS percentage of up to 40% improved overall methane yield by 44% and 34%, respectively. Synergistic effect was observed when either combining two or three substrates as AD feedstock, possibly as a result of increased biodegradability of organic materials in chicken fat and kitchen waste compared with dairy manure. Addition of chicken fat improved methane yield more than kitchen waste. However, addition of chicken fat VS over 0.8 g L(-1) should be cautiously done because it may cause reactor failure due to decrease in pH. The maximum methane yield was 425 L-CH4 kg(-1)-VS, achieved at a VS ratio of 2:2:1 for kitchen waste, chicken fat, and dairy manure. Results from batch AD experiment demonstrated that supplementing dairy manure to chicken fat and/or kitchen waste improved alkalinity of substrate due to the inclusion of more titratable bases in dairy manure, and therefore stabilized the methanogenesis and substantially improved biogas yield. A mixture of substrates of kitchen waste, chicken fat, and dairy manure at a ratio of 1:1:3 was fed to a continuously stirred tank reactor operated at organic loading rates of 3.28, 6.55, and 2.18 g-COD L(-1)-day (hydraulic retention time of 20, 10, and 30 days, respectively) under mesophilic condition, and methane production rate reached 0.65, 0.95, and 0.34 L-CH4 L(-1)-reactor-day.
将食物垃圾引入厌氧消化(AD)为增加原料供应以及提高AD的整体能源产量带来了光明前景。本研究评估了两种典型食物垃圾(厨余垃圾和鸡脂肪)与奶牛粪便共消化的生物降解性和甲烷潜力。对于单一底物,生物甲烷潜力测定表明,厨余垃圾的甲烷产量最高,添加量为352 L-CH4 kg(-1)-VS,比单独的奶牛粪便高出92%。相同挥发性固体(VS)水平(2 g L(-1))下的鸡脂肪抑制了生物甲烷的产生。添加厨余垃圾和鸡脂肪使VS百分比高达40%时,总甲烷产量分别提高了44%和34%。当将两种或三种底物组合作为AD原料时观察到协同效应,这可能是由于与奶牛粪便相比,鸡脂肪和厨余垃圾中有机物质的生物降解性增加所致。添加鸡脂肪比添加厨余垃圾对甲烷产量的提高更显著。然而,鸡脂肪VS添加量超过0.8 g L(-1)时应谨慎操作,因为这可能会因pH值下降导致反应器故障。在厨余垃圾、鸡脂肪和奶牛粪便的VS比例为2:2:1时,实现了最大甲烷产量425 L-CH4 kg(-1)-VS。批次AD实验结果表明,向鸡脂肪和/或厨余垃圾中添加奶牛粪便可提高底物的碱度,因为奶牛粪便中含有更多可滴定碱,从而稳定了甲烷生成并显著提高了沼气产量。将厨余垃圾、鸡脂肪和奶牛粪便按1:1:3的比例混合,在中温条件下以3.28、6.55和2.18 g-COD L(-1)-天的有机负荷率(水力停留时间分别为20、10和30天)进料到连续搅拌槽式反应器中,甲烷产率分别达到0.65、0.95和0.34 L-CH4 L(-1)-反应器-天。