Dudek Dariusz, Dziewierz Artur, Brener Sorin J, Abizaid Alexandre, Merkely Béla, Costa Ricardo A, Bar Eli, Rakowski Tomasz, Kornowski Ran, Dressler Ovidiu, Abizaid Andrea, Silber Sigmund, Stone Gregg W
From the Department of Interventional Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland (D.D., A.D., T.R.); Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY (S.J.B., O.D., G.W.S.); Department of Cardiology, New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn (S.J.B.); Department of Cardiology, Institute Dante Pazzanese of Cardiology, Sao Paulo, Brazil (Alexandre Abizaid, R.A.C., Andrea Abizaid); Department of Cardiology, Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary (B.M.); Cardiovascular Research Center, São Paolo, Brazil (R.A.C.); InspireMD, Tel Aviv, Israel (E.B.); Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tiqva, Israel (R.K.); Department of Cardiology, Heart Center at the Isar, Munich, Germany (S.S.); and Department of Cardiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital (G.W.S.).
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Feb;8(2):e001484. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001484.
The MGuard, a bare metal stent covered with a polymer mesh, was designed to reduce distal embolization during percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. In the MGUARD for Acute ST Elevation Reperfusion trial, the primary end point of complete ST-segment resolution was significantly improved with the MGuard compared with control. We evaluated 1-year clinical and angiographic results.
Patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction ≤12 hours undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention of a single de novo native lesion were randomized to the MGuard versus any commercially available metallic stent (39.8% drug-eluting). Clinical follow-up was performed through 1 year, and angiography at 13 months was planned in 50 MGuard patients. There was no difference in major adverse cardiac events (1.8% versus 2.3%; P=0.75) at 30 days between the groups. Major adverse cardiac events at 1 year were higher with the MGuard, driven by greater ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (8.6% versus 0.9%; P=0.0003). Conversely, mortality tended to be lower with the MGuard at 30 days (0% versus 1.9%; P=0.04) and at 1 year (1.0% versus 3.3%; P=0.09). Late lumen loss at 13 months in the MGuard was 0.99±0.80 mm, and binary restenosis was 31.6%.
In patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention, a trend toward reduced 1-year mortality was present in patients treated with the MGuard stent. Target lesion revascularization and major adverse cardiac events rates during follow-up were higher in the MGuard group than in the control stent group, and angiographic late loss of the MGuard was consistent with that expected from bare metal stents.
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01368471.
MGuard是一种覆盖有聚合物网的裸金属支架,旨在减少ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间的远端栓塞。在MGUARD急性ST段抬高再灌注试验中,与对照组相比,MGuard显著改善了完全ST段回落的主要终点。我们评估了1年的临床和血管造影结果。
对发病≤12小时、接受单处初发原位病变直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者,随机分为MGuard组和任何市售金属支架组(39.8%为药物洗脱支架)。进行为期1年的临床随访,并计划对50例MGuard组患者在13个月时进行血管造影。两组在30天时的主要不良心脏事件发生率无差异(1.8%对2.3%;P = 0.75)。MGuard组1年时的主要不良心脏事件发生率较高,主要是由于缺血驱动的靶病变血运重建率更高(8.6%对0.9%;P = 0.0003)。相反,MGuard组在30天时的死亡率趋于较低(0%对1.9%;P = 0.04),在1年时也是如此(1.0%对3.3%;P = 0.09)。MGuard组在13个月时的晚期管腔丢失为0.99±0.80 mm,支架内再狭窄率为31.6%。
在接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,使用MGuard支架治疗的患者1年死亡率有降低趋势。随访期间,MGuard组的靶病变血运重建率和主要不良心脏事件发生率高于对照支架组,且MGuard的血管造影晚期管腔丢失与裸金属支架预期相符。