Suppr超能文献

激励式呼吸训练对剖腹术后肺功能的影响:一项随机临床试验。

The effect of incentive spirometry on postoperative pulmonary function following laparotomy: a randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Kamuzu Central Hospital, Lilongwe, Malawi2Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.

Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2015 Mar 1;150(3):229-36. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1846.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Changes in pulmonary dynamics following laparotomy are well documented. Deep breathing exercises, with or without incentive spirometry, may help counteract postoperative decreased vital capacity; however, the evidence for the role of incentive spirometry in the prevention of postoperative atelectasis is inconclusive. Furthermore, data are scarce regarding the prevention of postoperative atelectasis in sub-Saharan Africa.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of the use of incentive spirometry on pulmonary function following exploratory laparotomy as measured by forced vital capacity (FVC).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a single-center, randomized clinical trial performed at Kamuzu Central Hospital, Lilongwe, Malawi. Study participants were adult patients who underwent exploratory laparotomy and were randomized into the intervention or control groups (standard of care) from February 1 to November 30, 2013. All patients received routine postoperative care, including instructions for deep breathing and early ambulation. We used bivariate analysis to compare outcomes between the intervention and control groups.

INTERVENTION

Adult patients who underwent exploratory laparotomy participated in postoperative deep breathing exercises. Patients in the intervention group received incentive spirometers.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

We assessed pulmonary function using a peak flow meter to measure FVC in both groups of patients. Secondary outcomes, such as hospital length of stay and mortality, were obtained from the medical records.

RESULTS

A total of 150 patients were randomized (75 in each arm). The median age in the intervention and control groups was 35 years (interquartile range, 28-53 years) and 33 years (interquartile range, 23-46 years), respectively. Men predominated in both groups, and most patients underwent emergency procedures (78.7% in the intervention group and 84.0% in the control group). Mean initial FVC did not differ significantly between the intervention and control groups (0.92 and 0.90 L, respectively; P=.82 [95% CI, 0.52-2.29]). Although patients in the intervention group tended to have higher final FVC measurements, the change between the first and last measured FVC was not statistically significant (0.29 and 0.25 L, respectively; P=.68 [95% CI, 0.65-1.95]). Likewise, hospital length of stay did not differ significantly between groups. Overall postoperative mortality was 6.0%, with a higher mortality rate in the control group compared with the intervention group (10.7% and 1.3%, respectively; P=.02 [95% CI, 0.01-0.92]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Education and provision of incentive spirometry for unmonitored patient use does not result in statistically significant improvement in pulmonary dynamics following laparotomy. We would not recommend the addition of incentive spirometry to the current standard of care in this resource-constrained environment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01789177.

摘要

重要性

剖腹术后肺动力学的变化已有充分的文献记载。深呼吸运动,无论是否使用激励式肺活量计,都可能有助于对抗术后肺活量降低;然而,激励式肺活量计在预防术后肺不张方面的作用的证据并不确定。此外,关于激励式肺活量计在撒哈拉以南非洲预防术后肺不张的数据也很有限。

目的

通过用力肺活量(FVC)来确定激励式肺活量计在剖腹术后对肺功能的影响。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项在马拉维利隆圭的卡姆祖中央医院进行的单中心、随机临床试验。研究对象为接受剖腹探查术的成年患者,他们于 2013 年 2 月 1 日至 11 月 30 日被随机分为干预组和对照组(标准护理)。所有患者均接受常规术后护理,包括深呼吸和早期活动的指导。我们使用双变量分析比较了干预组和对照组之间的结果。

干预

接受剖腹探查术的成年患者参加了术后深呼吸运动。干预组的患者使用了激励式肺活量计。

主要结局和测量指标

我们使用峰值流量计评估两组患者的肺功能,以测量 FVC。从病历中获得次要结局,如住院时间和死亡率。

结果

共有 150 名患者被随机分组(每组 75 名)。干预组和对照组的中位年龄分别为 35 岁(四分位距 28-53 岁)和 33 岁(四分位距 23-46 岁)。两组均以男性为主,大多数患者接受了紧急手术(干预组 78.7%,对照组 84.0%)。初始 FVC 均值在干预组和对照组之间无显著差异(分别为 0.92 和 0.90 L;P=.82[95%CI,0.52-2.29])。尽管干预组的患者倾向于有更高的最终 FVC 测量值,但第一和最后一次测量的 FVC 之间的变化无统计学意义(分别为 0.29 和 0.25 L;P=.68[95%CI,0.65-1.95])。同样,两组的住院时间无显著差异。总术后死亡率为 6.0%,对照组的死亡率高于干预组(分别为 10.7%和 1.3%;P=.02[95%CI,0.01-0.92])。

结论和相关性

对未监测的患者使用教育和提供激励式肺活量计并没有导致剖腹术后肺动力学的统计学显著改善。在这种资源有限的环境下,我们不建议将激励式肺活量计添加到当前的标准护理中。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT01789177。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验