• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰出生队列研究乳腺癌钼靶筛查的过度诊断。

Overdiagnosis by mammographic screening for breast cancer studied in birth cohorts in The Netherlands.

机构信息

Department for Health Evidence, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Dutch Reference Center for Screening, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Cancer. 2015 Aug 15;137(4):921-9. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29452. Epub 2015 Feb 5.

DOI:10.1002/ijc.29452
PMID:25612892
Abstract

A drawback of early detection of breast cancer through mammographic screening is the diagnosis of breast cancers that would never have become clinically detected. This phenomenon, called overdiagnosis, is ideally quantified from the breast cancer incidence of screened and unscreened cohorts of women with follow-up until death. Such cohorts do not exist, requiring other methods to estimate overdiagnosis. We are the first to quantify overdiagnosis from invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in birth cohorts using an age-period-cohort -model (APC-model) including variables for the initial and subsequent screening rounds and a 5-year period after leaving screening. Data on the female population and breast cancer incidence were obtained from Statistics Netherlands, "Stichting Medische registratie" and the Dutch Cancer Registry for women aged 0-99 years. Data on screening participation was obtained from the five regional screening organizations. Overdiagnosis was calculated from the excess breast cancer incidence in the screened group divided by the breast cancer incidence in presence of screening for women aged 20-99 years (population perspective) and for women in the screened-age range (individual perspective). Overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer was 11% from the population perspective and 17% from the invited women perspective in birth cohorts screened from age 49 to 74. For invasive breast cancer and DCIS together, overdiagnosis was 14% from population perspective and 22% from invited women perspective. A major strength of an APC-model including the different phases of screening is that it allows to estimate overdiagnosis in birth cohorts, thereby preventing overestimation.

摘要

通过乳腺 X 光筛查早期发现乳腺癌的一个缺点是诊断出原本不会在临床上被发现的乳腺癌。这种现象称为过度诊断,理想情况下可以通过对经过乳腺 X 光筛查和未经筛查的女性队列进行随访,直到死亡,来从乳腺癌发病率中进行量化。但这些队列并不存在,因此需要其他方法来估计过度诊断。我们是第一个使用年龄-时期-队列模型(APC 模型),包括初始和后续筛查轮次以及离开筛查后的 5 年期间的变量,从出生队列中对浸润性乳腺癌和导管原位癌(DCIS)的过度诊断进行量化的人。女性人口和乳腺癌发病率数据来自荷兰统计局、“Stichting Medische registratie”和荷兰癌症登记处,年龄为 0-99 岁的女性。筛查参与数据来自五个区域筛查组织。通过将筛查组中多余的乳腺癌发病率除以存在筛查的女性(20-99 岁人群,从人群角度)和筛查年龄组内的女性(从个体角度)的乳腺癌发病率,计算出过度诊断。从人群角度来看,从 49 岁到 74 岁筛查的出生队列中,浸润性乳腺癌的过度诊断率为 11%,从邀请女性角度来看为 17%。从人群角度来看,浸润性乳腺癌和 DCIS 一起的过度诊断率为 14%,从邀请女性角度来看为 22%。一个包括不同筛查阶段的 APC 模型的主要优势在于,它可以在出生队列中估计过度诊断,从而避免过度估计。

相似文献

1
Overdiagnosis by mammographic screening for breast cancer studied in birth cohorts in The Netherlands.荷兰出生队列研究乳腺癌钼靶筛查的过度诊断。
Int J Cancer. 2015 Aug 15;137(4):921-9. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29452. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
2
Obligate Overdiagnosis Due to Mammographic Screening: A Direct Estimate for U.S. Women.因乳腺 X 光筛查导致的必然过度诊断:美国女性的直接评估
Radiology. 2018 May;287(2):391-397. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017171622. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
3
Natural history of breast cancers detected in the Swedish mammography screening programme: a cohort study.在瑞典乳腺 X 光筛查计划中检出的乳腺癌的自然史:一项队列研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Nov;12(12):1118-24. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70250-9. Epub 2011 Oct 11.
4
The contribution of mammography screening to breast cancer incidence trends in the United States: an updated age-period-cohort model.乳腺X线筛查对美国乳腺癌发病趋势的贡献:一个更新的年龄-时期-队列模型
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Jun;24(6):905-12. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-1286. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
5
Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of breast cancer: estimates of overdiagnosis from two trials of mammographic screening for breast cancer.乳腺癌的过度诊断与过度治疗:两项乳腺癌钼靶筛查试验中的过度诊断估计
Breast Cancer Res. 2005;7(6):258-65. doi: 10.1186/bcr1354. Epub 2005 Nov 10.
6
Extrapolation of pre-screening trends: Impact of assumptions on overdiagnosis estimates by mammographic screening.预筛选趋势推断:假设对乳腺 X 线筛查过度诊断估计的影响。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2016 Jun;42:147-53. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2016.04.015. Epub 2016 May 3.
7
The distribution of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) grade in 4232 women and its impact on overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening.4232名女性原位导管癌(DCIS)分级的分布及其对乳腺癌筛查中过度诊断的影响。
Breast Cancer Res. 2016 May 10;18(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13058-016-0705-5.
8
Immediate and delayed effects of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality and incidence in birth cohorts.乳腺筛查对出生队列乳腺癌死亡率和发病率的即时和延迟影响。
Br J Cancer. 2013 Oct 29;109(9):2467-71. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.627. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
9
The natural history of invasive breast cancers detected by screening mammography.通过乳腺钼靶筛查发现的浸润性乳腺癌的自然史。
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Nov 24;168(21):2311-6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.21.2311.
10
Overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer due to mammography screening: results from the Norwegian screening program.由于乳腺 X 线筛查导致的浸润性乳腺癌过度诊断:来自挪威筛查项目的结果。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Apr 3;156(7):491-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-7-201204030-00005.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic value of histopathological DCIS features in a large-scale international interrater reliability study.在一项大规模国际评分者间可靠性研究中,组织病理学导管原位癌特征的预后价值
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Oct;183(3):759-770. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05816-x. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
2
Validation of the BOADICEA model and a 313-variant polygenic risk score for breast cancer risk prediction in a Dutch prospective cohort.验证 BOADICEA 模型和一个包含 313 个变异的多基因风险评分在荷兰前瞻性队列中对乳腺癌风险预测的性能。
Genet Med. 2020 Nov;22(11):1803-1811. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-0884-4. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
3
Use of Mastectomy for Overdiagnosed Breast Cancer in the United States: Analysis of the SEER 9 Cancer Registries.
美国对过度诊断的乳腺癌实施乳房切除术的情况:监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)9癌症登记处分析
J Cancer Epidemiol. 2019 Jan 22;2019:5072506. doi: 10.1155/2019/5072506. eCollection 2019.
4
Mortality of women with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a population-based study from the Girona province, Spain (1994-2013).乳腺导管原位癌女性的死亡率:来自西班牙赫罗纳省的一项基于人群的研究(1994-2013 年)。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2019 Jul;21(7):891-899. doi: 10.1007/s12094-018-1994-1. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
5
Effectiveness of and overdiagnosis from mammography screening in the Netherlands: population based study.荷兰乳腺钼靶筛查的有效性及过度诊断:基于人群的研究
BMJ. 2017 Dec 5;359:j5224. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j5224.
6
Prevalence of incidental breast cancer and precursor lesions in autopsy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.尸检研究中偶然发现的乳腺癌及癌前病变的发生率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Dec 2;17(1):808. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3808-1.
7
The method of detection of ductal carcinoma in situ has no therapeutic implications: results of a population-based cohort study.原位导管癌的检测方法并无治疗意义:一项基于人群的队列研究结果
Breast Cancer Res. 2017 Mar 9;19(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13058-017-0819-4.
8
Subsequent risk of ipsilateral and contralateral invasive breast cancer after treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: incidence and the effect of radiotherapy in a population-based cohort of 10,090 women.导管原位癌治疗后同侧和对侧浸润性乳腺癌的后续风险:10,090名女性人群队列中的发病率及放疗效果
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Oct;159(3):553-63. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3973-y. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
9
Double versus single reading of mammograms in a breast cancer screening programme: a cost-consequence analysis.乳腺癌筛查项目中乳腺钼靶片的双人阅片与单人阅片:成本效益分析
Eur Radiol. 2016 Sep;26(9):3262-71. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4175-4. Epub 2016 Jan 8.