• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

下颌后缩/小颌畸形的产前指标。

Prenatal indices for mandibular retrognathia/micrognathia.

作者信息

Neuschulz J, Wilhelm L, Christ H, Braumann B

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, University of Cologne Medical School, Kerpener Str. 32, 50931, Cologne, Germany,

出版信息

J Orofac Orthop. 2015 Jan;76(1):30-40. doi: 10.1007/s00056-014-0257-1. Epub 2015 Jan 22.

DOI:10.1007/s00056-014-0257-1
PMID:25613383
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Micro- and retrognathia of mandibular origin may lead to life-threatening respiratory problems in connection with glossoptosis immediately after birth. Prenatal screening for this malformation is therefore increasingly important. Today this is accomplished by predominantly subjective standards. Objective criteria have been proposed but have not become established. We therefore made an effort to develop indices that would identify major skeletal discrepancies or micrognathia in as straightforward a fashion as possible during routine prenatal sonography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Series of fetal jaw sonograms (Toshiba Aplio MX®) were obtained in 313 women with normal pregnancies from weeks 19-29 of gestation. Upper- and lower-jaw landmarks were interactively located on screen and evaluated for reproducibility. Linear parameters representative of maxillary and mandibular length (SpA'-SpP' and Rami-SymMe) were measured and related to femur length and gestational age. Based on these data, indices for maxillary, and mandibular length were derived and analyzed.

RESULTS

High correlations were identified for mandibular length both with gestational age (R = 0.845; R(2) = 0.713) and with femur length (correlation coefficients (R) = 0.839; coefficients of determination (R(2)) = 0.704). For maxillary length, the respective correlation coefficients were 0.691 (R(2) = 0.477) and 0.656 (R(2) = 0.430). Estimates of mandibular and maxillary length based on gestational age and femur length were obtained by regression analysis. The mean bimaxillary length ratio was 0.628 ± 0.043.

CONCLUSION

Maxillary and mandibular growth can be objectively evaluated via indices. It is conceivable to develop this approach into a sensitive and reliable method of prenatal jaw screening for major skeletal anomalies and congenital malformations.

摘要

目的

下颌源性小颌畸形和后缩畸形在出生后可能会立即导致与舌后坠相关的危及生命的呼吸问题。因此,对这种畸形进行产前筛查变得越来越重要。如今,这主要通过主观标准来完成。虽然已经提出了客观标准,但尚未确立。因此,我们努力开发一些指标,以便在常规产前超声检查期间以尽可能直接的方式识别主要的骨骼差异或小颌畸形。

材料与方法

从313名妊娠19 - 29周的正常孕妇中获取一系列胎儿颌部超声图像(东芝Aplio MX®)。上下颌的标志点在屏幕上交互式定位,并评估其可重复性。测量代表上颌和下颌长度的线性参数(SpA'-SpP'和下颌支 - 颏下点),并将其与股骨长度和孕周相关联。基于这些数据,得出并分析上颌和下颌长度的指标。

结果

下颌长度与孕周(R = 0.845;R² = 0.713)以及与股骨长度(相关系数(R)= 0.839;决定系数(R²)= 0.704)之间均存在高度相关性。对于上颌长度,相应的相关系数分别为0.691(R² = 0.477)和0.656(R² = 0.430)。通过回归分析获得基于孕周和股骨长度的下颌和上颌长度估计值。双颌长度的平均比值为0.628±0.043。

结论

上颌和下颌的生长可以通过指标进行客观评估。可以想象,将这种方法发展成为一种用于产前颌部筛查主要骨骼异常和先天性畸形的敏感且可靠的方法。

相似文献

1
Prenatal indices for mandibular retrognathia/micrognathia.下颌后缩/小颌畸形的产前指标。
J Orofac Orthop. 2015 Jan;76(1):30-40. doi: 10.1007/s00056-014-0257-1. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
2
The fetal mandible: a 2D and 3D sonographic approach to the diagnosis of retrognathia and micrognathia.胎儿下颌骨:二维和三维超声检查法诊断小下颌后缩和小下颌畸形
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Feb;19(2):122-30. doi: 10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00622.x.
3
Absent mandibular gap in the retronasal triangle view: a clue to the diagnosis of micrognathia in the first trimester.后鼻三角矢状位未见下颌间隙:提示早孕期下颌发育不良。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Feb;39(2):152-6. doi: 10.1002/uog.10121. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
4
Normal mandibular growth and diagnosis of micrognathia at prenatal MRI.产前MRI检查下正常下颌骨生长及小颌畸形的诊断
Prenat Diagn. 2015 Feb;35(2):108-16. doi: 10.1002/pd.4496. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
5
Prenatal Diagnosis of Robin Sequence: Sensitivity, Specificity, and Clinical Relevance of an Index for Micrognathia.Robin 序列的产前诊断:小下颌指数的灵敏度、特异性和临床相关性。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2021 Aug;58(8):1012-1019. doi: 10.1177/1055665620972297. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
6
Sonographic measurement of the fetal mandible: standards for normal pregnancy.
Am J Perinatol. 1993 May;10(3):226-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-994725.
7
Objective diagnosis of micrognathia in the fetus: the jaw index.胎儿小颌畸形的客观诊断:下颌指数
Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Mar;93(3):382-6. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00414-1.
8
Prenatal assessment of the antero-posterior jaw relationship in human fetuses: from anatomical to ultrasound cephalometric analysis.人类胎儿前后颌关系的产前评估:从解剖学分析到超声头影测量分析
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011 Jul;48(4):465-72. doi: 10.1597/09-221. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
9
Lack of mandibular movement manifested by absent fetal swallowing: a possible factor in the pathogenesis of micrognathia.
Am J Perinatol. 1995 Jan;12(1):30-3. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-994395.
10
Frontomaxillary and mandibulomaxillary facial angles at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks in fetuses with trisomy 18.18三体胎儿在孕11 + 0至13 + 6周时的额上颌及下颌上颌面部角度。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Dec;30(7):928-33. doi: 10.1002/uog.5188.

引用本文的文献

1
Perinatal Airway Management Mandibular Anomalies: A National Inpatient Cohort Analysis.围产期气道管理下颌骨异常:一项全国住院患者队列分析。
Laryngoscope. 2025 May;135 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S1-S12. doi: 10.1002/lary.31699. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
2
Disrupted tenogenesis in masseter as a potential cause of micrognathia.咀嚼肌成纤维细胞发生紊乱可能是小颌畸形的潜在原因。
Int J Oral Sci. 2022 Oct 18;14(1):50. doi: 10.1038/s41368-022-00196-y.
3
Reference ranges of fetal mandible measurements: Inferior facial angle, jaw index, mandible width/maxilla width ratio and mandible length in Thai fetuses at 15 to 23 weeks of gestation.

本文引用的文献

1
[Sonographic evaluation of fetal clefts of the lip, alveolus and palate].[胎儿唇、牙槽突及腭裂的超声评估]
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2012 Apr;216(2):63-72. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1309028. Epub 2012 Apr 19.
2
Feasibility of 3-dimensional sonographic examination of the fetal secondary palate during the second-trimester anatomy scan.中孕期超声二联筛查时胎儿腭部二维超声检查的可行性。
J Ultrasound Med. 2011 Dec;30(12):1619-24. doi: 10.7863/jum.2011.30.12.1619.
3
First-trimester diagnosis of cleft lip and palate using three-dimensional ultrasound.
胎儿下颌测量的参考范围:15 至 23 孕周泰国胎儿的下面部角、下颌指数、下颌宽度/上颌宽度比和下颌长度。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 1;17(6):e0269095. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269095. eCollection 2022.
4
Prenatal diagnosis of auriculocondylar syndrome with a novel missense variant of GNAI3: a case report.产前诊断新型错义变异 GNAI3 所致耳-颌发育不良综合征 1 例报告。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Nov 17;21(1):780. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04238-x.
应用三维超声技术对胎儿唇腭裂的早期诊断
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jul;40(1):40-6. doi: 10.1002/uog.10139.
4
Absent mandibular gap in the retronasal triangle view: a clue to the diagnosis of micrognathia in the first trimester.后鼻三角矢状位未见下颌间隙:提示早孕期下颌发育不良。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Feb;39(2):152-6. doi: 10.1002/uog.10121. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
5
Fetal micrognathia: objective assessment and associated anomalies on prenatal sonogram.胎儿小下颌畸形:产前超声的客观评估及其相关异常。
Prenat Diagn. 2011 Feb;31(2):146-51. doi: 10.1002/pd.2661. Epub 2011 Jan 4.
6
Prenatal ultrasound screening for orofacial clefts.产前超声筛查口腔颌面裂。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Oct;38(4):434-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.8895. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
7
Prenatal assessment of the antero-posterior jaw relationship in human fetuses: from anatomical to ultrasound cephalometric analysis.人类胎儿前后颌关系的产前评估:从解剖学分析到超声头影测量分析
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011 Jul;48(4):465-72. doi: 10.1597/09-221. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
8
The 'equals sign': a novel marker in the diagnosis of fetal isolated cleft palate.“等于号”:诊断胎儿孤立性腭裂的新标志物。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Oct;36(4):439-44. doi: 10.1002/uog.7704.
9
Fetal micrognathia: almost always an ominous finding.胎儿小颌畸形:几乎总是一个不祥的发现。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Apr;35(4):377-84. doi: 10.1002/uog.7639.
10
Diagnostic accuracy of transabdominal ultrasound in detecting prenatal cleft lip and palate: a systematic review.经腹超声产前诊断唇腭裂的准确性:系统评价。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Apr;35(4):495-502. doi: 10.1002/uog.7472.