Suppr超能文献

20 项多伦多述情障碍量表在大量躯体形式障碍患者中的因子结构。

Factorial structure of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale in a large sample of somatoform patients.

机构信息

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Straße 25, D-53105 Bonn, Germany.

Department of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2015 Feb 28;225(3):355-63. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.12.013. Epub 2014 Dec 19.

Abstract

Although a strong association between alexithymia and somatization has been postulated in numerous studies, no systematic study has investigated the psychometric properties of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) in a sample of patients with somatoform disorder yet. The purpose of this study was to ensure a valid assessment by the German version of the TAS-20 in somatoform samples. We investigated whether the original three-factor model proposed by Bagby et al. (1994a), which is widely used in clinical research and practice, is replicable in a large sample of somatoform patients (n=806). Using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) the goodness-of-fit of the originally proposed factor structure was compared to three factor models generated with exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and other factorial solutions derived from the literature. Our results demonstrate that the original three-factor model is not replicable in somatoform patients. Instead, the four-factor model by Franz et al. (2001b) described the data best. However, none of the models met all criteria of confirmatory factor analysis. Our results indicate that the three-factor model is not robust in the German version of the TAS-20. At this state of research we recommend to use the TAS-20 sum-score as a measure of alexithymia in somatoform patients in clinical practice.

摘要

虽然在许多研究中都假设了述情障碍与躯体化之间存在很强的关联,但迄今为止,还没有系统的研究调查过 20 项多伦多述情障碍量表(TAS-20)在躯体形式障碍患者样本中的心理测量特性。本研究的目的是确保 TAS-20 的德文版本能够对躯体形式样本进行有效的评估。我们调查了 Bagby 等人(1994a)提出的原始三因素模型(在临床研究和实践中广泛使用)是否可以在大量躯体形式患者样本(n=806)中复制。使用验证性因子分析(CFA),将最初提出的因子结构的拟合优度与通过探索性因子分析(EFA)生成的三个因子模型以及从文献中得出的其他因子解决方案进行了比较。我们的结果表明,原始的三因素模型在躯体形式患者中不可复制。相反,Franz 等人(2001b)的四因素模型最能描述数据。然而,没有一个模型符合验证性因子分析的所有标准。我们的结果表明,三因素模型在 TAS-20 的德文版本中并不稳健。在研究的现阶段,我们建议在临床实践中使用 TAS-20 总分作为躯体形式患者述情障碍的衡量标准。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验