Todesco Eve, Rodriguez Christophe, Morand-Joubert Laurence, Mercier-Darty Mélanie, Desire Nathalie, Wirden Marc, Girard Pierre-Marie, Katlama Christine, Calvez Vincent, Marcelin Anne-Geneviève
Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ. Paris 06, UMR S_1136, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, F-75013 Paris, France INSERM, UMR S_1136, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, F-75013 Paris, France Department of Virology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP Paris, France
Department of Virology, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Université Paris-Est, Créteil, France INSERM U955, Créteil, France.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015 May;70(5):1503-6. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku557. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
Resistant minority variants present before ART can be a source of virological failure. This has been shown for NRTIs, NNRTIs and CCR5 inhibitors. However, very few data are available for the detection of such minority resistant variants that could be selected at virological failure and not detected using classical Sanger sequencing.
We studied 26 patients treated with tenofovir, emtricitabine and efavirenz with their first virological failure (defined as two consecutive viral loads >50 copies/mL). We performed standard Sanger sequencing and ultradeep sequencing (UDS; Roche 454(®) Life Sciences) in plasma at failure. For UDS, mutations >1% were considered. We compared the presence of reverse transcriptase mutations between the two techniques, using the latest ANRS algorithm.
UDS detected more resistance mutations in 38.5% of cases (10/26 patients) and the genotypic sensitivity score (GSS) was reduced for 6 of them (23.1%). The GSS was impacted more often for NRTIs than for NNRTIs, for which most mutations were already detected by Sanger sequencing. Resistant minority variants were detected even in patients with low viral load at failure.
These results strongly argue for the use of next-generation sequencing in patients failing on an NRTI+NNRTI regimen, as UDS has the potential to modify the choice of the subsequent regimen.
抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)前存在的耐药性少数变异可能是病毒学失败的一个原因。这在核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂(NRTIs)、非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂(NNRTIs)和CCR5抑制剂中已得到证实。然而,对于检测此类在病毒学失败时可能被选择且使用经典桑格测序法无法检测到的少数耐药变异,可用数据非常少。
我们研究了26例接受替诺福韦、恩曲他滨和依非韦伦治疗且首次出现病毒学失败(定义为连续两次病毒载量>50拷贝/毫升)的患者。在失败时对血浆进行标准桑格测序和超深度测序(UDS;罗氏454®生命科学公司)。对于UDS,将>1%的突变视为有效突变。我们使用最新的法国国家艾滋病研究机构(ANRS)算法比较了两种技术之间逆转录酶突变的存在情况。
UDS在38.5%的病例(10/26例患者)中检测到更多耐药突变,其中6例(23.1%)的基因型敏感性评分(GSS)降低。NRTIs的GSS受到影响的频率高于NNRTIs,对于NNRTIs,大多数突变已通过桑格测序法检测到。即使在失败时病毒载量较低的患者中也检测到了耐药性少数变异。
这些结果有力地支持了在接受NRTI + NNRTI治疗方案失败的患者中使用新一代测序技术,因为超深度测序有可能改变后续治疗方案的选择。