Kurz David J, Radovanovic Dragana, Seifert Burkhardt, Bernheim Alain M, Roffi Marco, Pedrazzini Giovanni, Windecker Stephan, Erne Paul, Eberli Franz R
Clinic for Cardiology, Triemli Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
AMIS-Plus Data Center, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2016 Feb;5(1):13-22. doi: 10.1177/2048872614566946. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
The purpose of this study was to investigate outcomes of patients treated with prasugrel or clopidogrel after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a nationwide acute coronary syndrome (ACS) registry.
Prasugrel was found to be superior to clopidogrel in a randomized trial of ACS patients undergoing PCI. However, little is known about its efficacy in everyday practice.
All ACS patients enrolled in the Acute Myocardial Infarction in Switzerland (AMIS)-Plus registry undergoing PCI and being treated with a thienopyridine P2Y12 inhibitor between January 2010-December 2013 were included in this analysis. Patients were stratified according to treatment with prasugrel or clopidogrel and outcomes were compared using propensity score matching. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, recurrent infarction and stroke at hospital discharge.
Out of 7621 patients, 2891 received prasugrel (38%) and 4730 received clopidogrel (62%). Independent predictors of in-hospital mortality were age, Killip class >2, STEMI, Charlson comorbidity index >1, and resuscitation prior to admission. After propensity score matching (2301 patients per group), the primary endpoint was significantly lower in prasugrel-treated patients (3.0% vs 4.3%; p=0.022) while bleeding events were more frequent (4.1% vs 3.0%; p=0.048). In-hospital mortality was significantly reduced (1.8% vs 3.1%; p=0.004), but no significant differences were observed in rates of recurrent infarction (0.8% vs 0.7%; p=1.00) or stroke (0.5% vs 0.6%; p=0.85). In a predefined subset of matched patients with one-year follow-up (n=1226), mortality between discharge and one year was not significantly reduced in prasugrel-treated patients (1.3% vs 1.9%, p=0.38).
In everyday practice in Switzerland, prasugrel is predominantly used in younger patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. A propensity score-matched analysis suggests a mortality benefit from prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in these patients.
本研究旨在调查在全国性急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)登记处中,接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后使用普拉格雷或氯吡格雷治疗的患者的预后情况。
在一项针对接受PCI的ACS患者的随机试验中,发现普拉格雷优于氯吡格雷。然而,对于其在日常临床实践中的疗效知之甚少。
纳入2010年1月至2013年12月期间在瑞士急性心肌梗死(AMIS)-Plus登记处登记的所有接受PCI并使用噻吩并吡啶P2Y12抑制剂治疗的ACS患者进行分析。根据使用普拉格雷或氯吡格雷的治疗情况对患者进行分层,并使用倾向评分匹配法比较预后。主要终点是出院时死亡、再发梗死和中风的复合终点。
在7621例患者中,2891例接受普拉格雷治疗(38%),4730例接受氯吡格雷治疗(62%)。住院死亡率的独立预测因素包括年龄、Killip分级>2、ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)、Charlson合并症指数>1以及入院前进行心肺复苏。经过倾向评分匹配(每组2301例患者)后,接受普拉格雷治疗的患者主要终点显著降低(3.0%对4.3%;p=0.022),而出血事件更频繁(4.1%对3.0%;p=0.048)。住院死亡率显著降低(1.8%对3.1%;p=0.004),但再发梗死率(0.8%对0.7%;p=1.00)或中风率(0.5%对0.6%;p=0.85)未观察到显著差异。在一个预先定义的有一年随访的匹配患者亚组(n=1226)中,接受普拉格雷治疗的患者出院至一年期间的死亡率未显著降低(1.3%对1.9%,p=0.38)。
在瑞士的日常临床实践中,普拉格雷主要用于接受直接PCI的年轻STEMI患者。倾向评分匹配分析表明,在这些患者中,与氯吡格雷相比,普拉格雷有降低死亡率的益处。