• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床试验合格特征的可视化综合分析。

Visual aggregate analysis of eligibility features of clinical trials.

作者信息

He Zhe, Carini Simona, Sim Ida, Weng Chunhua

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.

Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.

出版信息

J Biomed Inform. 2015 Apr;54:241-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Jan 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.jbi.2015.01.005
PMID:25615940
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4408222/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop a method for profiling the collective populations targeted for recruitment by multiple clinical studies addressing the same medical condition using one eligibility feature each time.

METHODS

Using a previously published database COMPACT as the backend, we designed a scalable method for visual aggregate analysis of clinical trial eligibility features. This method consists of four modules for eligibility feature frequency analysis, query builder, distribution analysis, and visualization, respectively. This method is capable of analyzing (1) frequently used qualitative and quantitative features for recruiting subjects for a selected medical condition, (2) distribution of study enrollment on consecutive value points or value intervals of each quantitative feature, and (3) distribution of studies on the boundary values, permissible value ranges, and value range widths of each feature. All analysis results were visualized using Google Charts API. Five recruited potential users assessed the usefulness of this method for identifying common patterns in any selected eligibility feature for clinical trial participant selection.

RESULTS

We implemented this method as a Web-based analytical system called VITTA (Visual Analysis Tool of Clinical Study Target Populations). We illustrated the functionality of VITTA using two sample queries involving quantitative features BMI and HbA1c for conditions "hypertension" and "Type 2 diabetes", respectively. The recruited potential users rated the user-perceived usefulness of VITTA with an average score of 86.4/100.

CONCLUSIONS

We contributed a novel aggregate analysis method to enable the interrogation of common patterns in quantitative eligibility criteria and the collective target populations of multiple related clinical studies. A larger-scale study is warranted to formally assess the usefulness of VITTA among clinical investigators and sponsors in various therapeutic areas.

摘要

目的

开发一种方法,用于剖析针对同一医学病症的多项临床研究每次使用一个入选特征进行招募的总体人群。

方法

以前瞻性发布的数据库COMPACT作为后端,我们设计了一种用于临床试验入选特征可视化汇总分析的可扩展方法。该方法分别由四个模块组成,用于入选特征频率分析、查询构建器、分布分析和可视化。此方法能够分析:(1)为选定医学病症招募受试者时常用的定性和定量特征;(2)每项定量特征在连续值点或值区间上的研究入组分布;(3)各项特征在边界值、允许值范围和值范围宽度上的研究分布。所有分析结果均使用谷歌图表应用程序编程接口进行可视化。五名招募的潜在用户评估了该方法在识别用于临床试验参与者选择的任何选定入选特征中的常见模式方面的有用性。

结果

我们将此方法实现为一个名为VITTA(临床研究目标人群可视化分析工具)的基于网络的分析系统。我们分别使用两个涉及“高血压”和“2型糖尿病”病症的定量特征BMI和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的示例查询来说明VITTA的功能。招募的潜在用户对VITTA的用户感知有用性进行评分,平均得分为86.4/100。

结论

我们提供了一种新颖的汇总分析方法,以探究定量入选标准和多项相关临床研究的总体目标人群中的常见模式。有必要进行更大规模的研究,以正式评估VITTA在各个治疗领域的临床研究人员和申办者中的有用性。

相似文献

1
Visual aggregate analysis of eligibility features of clinical trials.临床试验合格特征的可视化综合分析。
J Biomed Inform. 2015 Apr;54:241-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
2
A method for analyzing commonalities in clinical trial target populations.一种分析临床试验目标人群共性的方法。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2014 Nov 14;2014:1777-86. eCollection 2014.
3
Feasibility of feature-based indexing, clustering, and search of clinical trials. A case study of breast cancer trials from ClinicalTrials.gov.基于特征的临床试验索引、聚类和搜索的可行性。以ClinicalTrials.gov上的乳腺癌试验为例。
Methods Inf Med. 2013;52(5):382-94. doi: 10.3414/ME12-01-0092. Epub 2013 May 13.
4
A distribution-based method for assessing the differences between clinical trial target populations and patient populations in electronic health records.一种基于分布的方法,用于评估电子健康记录中的临床试验目标人群和患者人群之间的差异。
Appl Clin Inform. 2014 May 7;5(2):463-79. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2013-12-RA-0105. eCollection 2014.
5
Query engine optimization for the EHR4CR protocol feasibility scenario.针对EHR4CR协议可行性场景的查询引擎优化。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:1080.
6
Automatic Selection of Clinical Trials Based on A Semantic Web Approach.基于语义网方法的临床试验自动选择
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;216:564-8.
7
Multivariate analysis of the population representativeness of related clinical studies.相关临床研究人群代表性的多变量分析。
J Biomed Inform. 2016 Apr;60:66-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
8
A novel approach to conducting clinical trials in the community setting: utilizing patient-driven platforms and social media to drive web-based patient recruitment.一种在社区环境中开展临床试验的新方法:利用患者驱动的平台和社交媒体来推动基于网络的患者招募。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Mar 13;20(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-00926-y.
9
Electronic medical record-based cohort selection and direct-to-patient, targeted recruitment: early efficacy and lessons learned.基于电子病历的队列选择和直接面向患者的靶向招募:早期疗效和经验教训。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Nov 1;26(11):1209-1217. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz168.
10
Requirements for a patient recruitment system.患者招募系统的要求。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;210:521-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Leveraging electronic health record data for clinical trial planning by assessing eligibility criteria's impact on patient count and safety.利用电子健康记录数据评估纳入标准对患者数量和安全性的影响,从而为临床试验规划提供依据。
J Biomed Inform. 2022 Mar;127:104032. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104032. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
2
A knowledge base of clinical trial eligibility criteria.临床试验入选标准知识库。
J Biomed Inform. 2021 May;117:103771. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103771. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
3
Patient Engagement in Medical Research Among Older Adults: Analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey.

本文引用的文献

1
Trend and Network Analysis of Common Eligibility Features for Cancer Trials in ClinicalTrials.gov.ClinicalTrials.gov上癌症试验常见合格特征的趋势与网络分析。
Smart Health. 2014 Jul;8549:130-141. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-08416-9_13.
2
A method for analyzing commonalities in clinical trial target populations.一种分析临床试验目标人群共性的方法。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2014 Nov 14;2014:1777-86. eCollection 2014.
3
Sharing and reporting the results of clinical trials.分享和报告临床试验结果。
老年人参与医学研究情况:健康信息国家趋势调查分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Oct 29;21(10):e15035. doi: 10.2196/15035.
4
Comparing and Contrasting A Priori and A Posteriori Generalizability Assessment of Clinical Trials on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.2型糖尿病临床试验的先验与后验可推广性评估之比较与对比
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Apr 16;2017:849-858. eCollection 2017.
5
Clinical Research Informatics: Supporting the Research Study Lifecycle.临床研究信息学:支持研究项目生命周期
Yearb Med Inform. 2017 Aug;26(1):193-200. doi: 10.15265/IY-2017-022. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
6
EliIE: An open-source information extraction system for clinical trial eligibility criteria.EliIE:一个用于临床试验资格标准的开源信息提取系统。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Nov 1;24(6):1062-1071. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx019.
7
Assessing the population representativeness of colorectal cancer treatment clinical trials.评估结直肠癌治疗临床试验的人群代表性。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016 Aug;2016:2970-2973. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591353.
8
Clinical Research Informatics for Big Data and Precision Medicine.大数据与精准医学的临床研究信息学
Yearb Med Inform. 2016 Nov 10(1):211-218. doi: 10.15265/IY-2016-019.
9
Automatic classification of registered clinical trials towards the Global Burden of Diseases taxonomy of diseases and injuries.将已注册的临床试验自动分类至全球疾病负担疾病和损伤分类法
BMC Bioinformatics. 2016 Sep 22;17(1):392. doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-1247-7.
10
Simulation-based Evaluation of the Generalizability Index for Study Traits.基于模拟的研究特征可推广性指数评估
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2015 Nov 5;2015:594-603. eCollection 2015.
JAMA. 2015 Jan 27;313(4):355-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.10716.
4
A distribution-based method for assessing the differences between clinical trial target populations and patient populations in electronic health records.一种基于分布的方法,用于评估电子健康记录中的临床试验目标人群和患者人群之间的差异。
Appl Clin Inform. 2014 May 7;5(2):463-79. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2013-12-RA-0105. eCollection 2014.
5
Blood pressure level and hypertension awareness and control differ by marital status, sex, and ethnicity: a population-based study.血压水平以及高血压知晓率和控制率因婚姻状况、性别和种族而异:一项基于人群的研究。
Am J Hypertens. 2014 Dec;27(12):1511-20. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpu081. Epub 2014 May 2.
6
A review of analytics and clinical informatics in health care.医疗保健领域的分析与临床信息学综述。
J Med Syst. 2014 Apr;38(4):45. doi: 10.1007/s10916-014-0045-x. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
7
Lack of diversity in orthopaedic trials conducted in the United States.美国开展的骨科试验中缺乏多样性。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Apr 2;96(7):e56. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00531.
8
Justification of exclusion criteria was underreported in a review of cardiovascular trials.在一项心血管试验综述中,排除标准的理由报告不足。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jun;67(6):635-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.005. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
9
The safety, efficacy and acceptability of task sharing tubal sterilization to midlevel providers: a systematic review.向中级医疗服务提供者分担输卵管绝育任务的安全性、有效性和可接受性:一项系统综述
Contraception. 2014 Jun;89(6):504-11. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.01.008. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
10
Clustering clinical trials with similar eligibility criteria features.对具有相似纳入标准特征的临床试验进行聚类。
J Biomed Inform. 2014 Dec;52:112-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.01.009. Epub 2014 Feb 1.