• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为何高风险的定义在以往的颈动脉试验中被不当使用。

Why the definition of high risk has been inappropriately used in previous carotid trials.

作者信息

De Borst G J, Schermerhorn M, Moll F L

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2015 Apr;56(2):145-52. Epub 2015 Jan 23.

PMID:25616062
Abstract

Carotid artery revascularization by endarterectomy is an effective means of stroke prevention in selected patients with carotid stenosis. With the development of endovascular techniques, carotid artery stenting (CAS) has been proposed as a viable alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA), particularly in patients considered at high risk for CEA. Guidelines have established criteria that outline these patients who are considered at "high risk" for complications after CEA, to whom CAS may provide benefit. The validity of these theoretical high-risk criteria, however, is yet unproven, and, as a consequence, there is no clear evidence suggesting that the risk with CAS is lower in these high-risk patients compared with CEA. This manuscript summarizes the role of "high risk" within recent trials and discusses why the optimal treatment for these patients with deemed high risk for surgery remains a matter of debate.

摘要

通过内膜切除术进行颈动脉血运重建是特定颈动脉狭窄患者预防中风的有效手段。随着血管内技术的发展,颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)已被提议作为颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的一种可行替代方法,尤其是在被认为接受CEA手术风险较高的患者中。指南已经制定了标准,概述了这些被认为在CEA术后出现并发症“高风险”的患者,CAS可能对他们有益。然而,这些理论上的高风险标准的有效性尚未得到证实,因此,没有明确证据表明在这些高风险患者中,CAS的风险低于CEA。本文总结了“高风险”在近期试验中的作用,并讨论了为什么对于这些被认为手术风险高的患者,最佳治疗方法仍存在争议。

相似文献

1
Why the definition of high risk has been inappropriately used in previous carotid trials.为何高风险的定义在以往的颈动脉试验中被不当使用。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2015 Apr;56(2):145-52. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
2
Recruiting RCTs comparing CAS, CEA and best medical treatment for asymptomatic carotid stenosis.招募比较颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)、颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)和无症状性颈动脉狭窄最佳药物治疗的随机对照试验。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2015 Dec;56(6):837-44. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
3
Treatment of significant carotid artery stenosis in 1824 patients.1824例严重颈动脉狭窄的治疗
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2015 Feb;56(1):107-18. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
4
Treatment strategies for carotid stenosis in patients at increased risk for surgery.颈动脉狭窄患者手术风险增加的治疗策略。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2011 Jul-Aug;54(1):22-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2011.03.004.
5
Revascularization of asymptomatic carotid stenosis is not appropriate in patients on dialysis.对于正在接受透析治疗的患者,对无症状性颈动脉狭窄进行血管重建术并不合适。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Mar;61(3):670-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.10.002.
6
Just when we thought we knew all the answers, someone changed the questions!正当我们以为知晓了所有答案时,却有人改变了问题!
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011 Feb;41(2):150-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.01.002. Epub 2011 Jan 19.
7
Carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting? Matching the patient to the intervention.颈动脉内膜切除术还是颈动脉支架置入术?使患者与干预措施相匹配。
Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2010 Jun;22(2):124-36. doi: 10.1177/1531003510381136.
8
Updated Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines for management of extracranial carotid disease.美国血管外科学会更新的颅外颈动脉疾病管理指南。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Sep;54(3):e1-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.07.031.
9
The risk of carotid artery stenting compared with carotid endarterectomy is greatest in patients treated within 7 days of symptoms.与颈动脉内膜切除术相比,在症状出现后 7 天内接受治疗的患者进行颈动脉支架置入术的风险最大。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Mar;57(3):619-626.e2; discussion 625-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.08.107. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
10
Carotid endarterectomy versus carotid angioplasty with or without stenting for treatment of carotid artery stenosis: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.颈动脉内膜切除术与颈动脉血管成形术(伴或不伴支架置入)治疗颈动脉狭窄的比较:随机对照试验的最新荟萃分析
Int Angiol. 2010 Jun;29(3):205-15.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of contralateral carotid artery stenosis on outcomes after carotid endarterectomy.对侧颈动脉狭窄对颈动脉内膜切除术预后的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Dec;66(6):1727-1734.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.04.032. Epub 2017 Jun 24.