• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

招募比较颈动脉支架置入术（CAS）、颈动脉内膜切除术（CEA）和无症状性颈动脉狭窄最佳药物治疗的随机对照试验。

Recruiting RCTs comparing CAS, CEA and best medical treatment for asymptomatic carotid stenosis.

作者信息

De Borst G J

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht The Netherlands -

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2015 Dec;56(6):837-44. Epub 2015 Sep 1.

PMID:26327611
Abstract

The present paper summarizes the similarities and differences between recent and ongoing randomized controlled trials on optimal treatment of patients with severe but asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Protocol details will be discussed as well as needs for outcome and especially differentiation between patients with a low versus high risk for future events.

摘要

本文总结了近期及正在进行的关于重度无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者最佳治疗的随机对照试验之间的异同。将讨论方案细节以及对结果的需求，特别是对未来事件低风险与高风险患者的区分。

相似文献

1
Recruiting RCTs comparing CAS, CEA and best medical treatment for asymptomatic carotid stenosis.招募比较颈动脉支架置入术（CAS）、颈动脉内膜切除术（CEA）和无症状性颈动脉狭窄最佳药物治疗的随机对照试验。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2015 Dec;56(6):837-44. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
2
Treatment of significant carotid artery stenosis in 1824 patients.1824例严重颈动脉狭窄的治疗
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2015 Feb;56(1):107-18. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
3
Why the definition of high risk has been inappropriately used in previous carotid trials.为何高风险的定义在以往的颈动脉试验中被不当使用。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2015 Apr;56(2):145-52. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
4
An evolution in thinking from modern carotid registries: CAS and CEA will be complimentary and not competitive techniques.现代颈动脉登记研究带来的思维转变：颈动脉支架置入术（CAS）和颈动脉内膜切除术（CEA）将成为互补而非相互竞争的技术。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Mar 1;75(4):526-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22482.
5
Revascularization of asymptomatic carotid stenosis is not appropriate in patients on dialysis.对于正在接受透析治疗的患者，对无症状性颈动脉狭窄进行血管重建术并不合适。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Mar;61(3):670-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.10.002.
6
Carotid angioplasty with stenting versus endarterectomy: 10-year randomized trial in a community hospital.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术的比较：社区医院的 10 年随机试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Feb;7(2):163-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.09.010.
7
Just when we thought we knew all the answers, someone changed the questions!正当我们以为知晓了所有答案时，却有人改变了问题！
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011 Feb;41(2):150-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.01.002. Epub 2011 Jan 19.
8
Endarterectomy achieves lower stroke and death rates compared with stenting in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis.对于无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者，与支架置入术相比，动脉内膜切除术可降低中风和死亡率。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Aug;66(2):607-617. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.04.053.
9
The Current Status of Carotid Endarterectomy Part II: Randomized Trials versus Angioplasty and Stenting.颈动脉内膜切除术的现状 第二部分：随机试验与血管成形术及支架置入术对比
Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Aug;43:24-40. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 May 5.
10
Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: Revascularization.无症状性颈动脉狭窄：血运重建
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2017 May-Jun;59(6):591-600. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 May 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Carotid endarterectomy for treatment of carotid in-stent restenosis: long-term follow-up results and surgery experiences from one single centre.颈动脉内膜切除术治疗颈动脉支架内再狭窄：单中心长期随访结果及手术经验。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017 Aug 24;2(3):140-146. doi: 10.1136/svn-2017-000089. eCollection 2017 Sep.
2
Gene expression analysis: Regulation of key genes associated with mycophenolate mofetil treatment of symptomatic carotid artery stenosis.基因表达分析：霉酚酸酯治疗有症状性颈动脉狭窄相关关键基因的调控。
Mol Med Rep. 2017 Nov;16(5):7450-7458. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2017.7532. Epub 2017 Sep 20.