Ely John W, Levy Barcey T, Daly Jeanette, Xu Yinghui
Department of Family Medicine, Joy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
J Cancer Educ. 2016 Mar;31(1):39-46. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0792-5.
Only about half of eligible individuals undergo colon cancer screening. We have limited knowledge about the patient beliefs that adversely affect screening decisions and about which beliefs might be amenable to change through education. As part of a clinical trial, 641 rural Iowans, aged 52 to 79 years, reported their beliefs about colon cancer screening in response to a mailed questionnaire. Consenting subjects were randomized into four groups, which were distinguished by four levels of increasingly intensive efforts to promote screening. Two of the groups received mailed educational materials and completed a follow-up questionnaire, which allowed us to determine whether their beliefs about screening changed following the education. We also completed a factor analysis to identify underlying (latent) factors that might explain the responses to 33 questions about readiness, attitudes, and perceived barriers related to colon cancer screening. The strongest predictors of a patient's stated readiness to be screened were a physician's recommendation to be screened (1 point difference on 10-point Likert scale, 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.5 to 1.6 point difference), a family history of colon cancer (0.85-point Likert scale difference, 95 % CI, 0.1 to 1.6), and a belief that health-care decisions should be mostly left to physicians rather than patients (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.21, P < .001). Of the 33 questionnaire items about screening beliefs, 11 (33 %) changed favorably following the educational intervention. In the factor analysis, the 33 items were reduced to 8 underlying factors, such as being too busy to undergo screening and worries about screening procedures. We found a limited number of underlying factors that may help explain patient resistance to colon cancer screening.
只有约一半符合条件的个体接受结肠癌筛查。我们对那些不利于筛查决策的患者信念,以及哪些信念可能通过教育得以改变的了解有限。作为一项临床试验的一部分,641名年龄在52至79岁之间的爱荷华州农村居民,通过邮寄问卷报告了他们对结肠癌筛查的信念。同意参与的受试者被随机分为四组,这四组的区别在于促进筛查的努力程度逐渐增强的四个水平。其中两组收到了邮寄的教育材料并完成了一份后续问卷,这使我们能够确定他们对筛查的信念在接受教育后是否发生了变化。我们还进行了因子分析,以识别可能解释对33个关于结肠癌筛查的准备情况、态度和感知障碍问题的回答的潜在因素。患者表示愿意接受筛查的最强预测因素是医生的筛查建议(在10分制李克特量表上相差1分,95%置信区间[CI],相差0.5至1.6分)、结肠癌家族史(李克特量表相差0.85分,95%CI,相差0.1至1.6分),以及认为医疗保健决策应主要由医生而非患者做出(斯皮尔曼相关系数0.21,P <.001)。在33个关于筛查信念的问卷项目中,11个(33%)在教育干预后有了积极变化。在因子分析中,这33个项目被缩减为8个潜在因素,如太忙而无法接受筛查以及对筛查程序的担忧。我们发现了数量有限的潜在因素,可能有助于解释患者对结肠癌筛查的抵触情绪。