Ghimenti Silvia, Tabucchi Sara, Bellagambi Francesca G, Lomonaco Tommaso, Onor Massimo, Trivella Maria Giovanna, Fuoco Roger, Di Francesco Fabio
Department of Chemistry and Industrial Chemistry, University of Pisa, Via Moruzzi, 3, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
Institute of Chemistry of Organometallic Compounds, CNR, Via Moruzzi 1, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2015 Mar 15;106:218-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2014.11.052. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
Volatile anaesthetics and disinfection chemicals pose ubiquitous inhalation and dermal exposure risks in hospital and clinic environments. This work demonstrates specific non-invasive breath biomonitoring methodology for assessing staff exposures to sevoflurane (SEV) anaesthetic, documenting its metabolite hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP) and measuring exposures to isopropanol (IPA) dermal disinfection fluid. Methods are based on breath sample collection in Nalophan bags, followed by an aliquot transfer to adsorption tube, and subsequent analysis by thermal desorption gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (TD-GC-MS). Ambient levels of IPA were also monitored. These methods could be generalized to other common volatile chemicals found in medical environments. Calibration curves were linear (r(2)=0.999) in the investigated ranges: 0.01-1000 ppbv for SEV, 0.02-1700 ppbv for IPA, and 0.001-0.1 ppbv for HFIP. The instrumental detection limit was 10 pptv for IPA and 5 pptv for SEV, both estimated by extracted ion-TIC chromatograms, whereas the HFIP minimum detectable concentration was 0.5 pptv as estimated in SIM acquisition mode. The methods were applied to hospital staff working in operating rooms and clinics for blood draws. SEV and HFIP were present in all subjects at concentrations in the range of 0.7-18, and 0.002-0.024 ppbv for SEV and HFIP respectively. Correlation between IPA ambient air and breath concentration confirmed the inhalation pathway of exposure (r=0.95, p<0.001) and breath-borne IPA was measured as high as 1500 ppbv. The methodology is easy to implement and valuable for screening exposures to common hospital chemicals. Although the overall exposures documented were generally below levels of health concern in this limited study, outliers were observed that indicate potential for acute exposures.
在医院和诊所环境中,挥发性麻醉剂和消毒化学品存在普遍的吸入和皮肤接触风险。这项工作展示了一种特定的非侵入性呼吸生物监测方法,用于评估工作人员对七氟醚(SEV)麻醉剂的接触情况,记录其代谢物六氟异丙醇(HFIP),并测量对异丙醇(IPA)皮肤消毒液的接触情况。方法基于在Nalophan袋中采集呼吸样本,随后将一份转移至吸附管,然后通过热解吸气相色谱 - 质谱联用仪(TD - GC - MS)进行分析。还监测了环境中的IPA水平。这些方法可推广到医疗环境中发现的其他常见挥发性化学品。在所研究的范围内校准曲线呈线性(r(2)=0.999):SEV为0.01 - 1000 ppbv,IPA为0.02 - 1700 ppbv,HFIP为0.001 - 0.1 ppbv。通过提取离子 - TIC色谱图估计,仪器对IPA的检测限为10 pptv,对SEV为5 pptv,而在SIM采集模式下估计HFIP的最低可检测浓度为0.5 pptv。这些方法应用于手术室和诊所中进行采血工作的医院工作人员。所有受试者体内均存在SEV和HFIP,其浓度范围分别为SEV 0.7 - 18 ppbv和HFIP 0.002 - 0.024 ppbv。IPA环境空气浓度与呼吸浓度之间的相关性证实了接触的吸入途径(r = 0.95,p < 0.001),且测得呼出的IPA高达1500 ppbv。该方法易于实施,对于筛查医院常见化学品的接触情况很有价值。尽管在这项有限的研究中记录的总体接触情况通常低于健康关注水平,但观察到有异常值表明存在急性接触的可能性。