Fiek Michael, Remp Thomas, Fleckenstein Martin, Pohl Tilman, Deiss Michael, Reithmann Christopher
Medizinische Klinik I, HELIOS Klinikum München West, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Universität München, Steinerweg 5, 81241, München, Germany.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015 Mar;42(2):151-60. doi: 10.1007/s10840-015-9973-8. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
Nonreentrant ventricular tachycardia (VT) originates in hearts without structural disease but occasionally can occur in patients with different cardiomyopathies equipped with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD).
In a series of 142 ICD recipients with structural heart disease undergoing ablation for recurrent or incessant monomorphic VT, nonreentrant VTs were identified.
Nonreentrant VTs were the cause of appropriate ICD interventions in 12 patients (8.4%). The underlying heart disease was nonischemic cardiomyopathy in eight patients, prior myocardial infarction in two patients, and valvular cardiomyopathy in two patients with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 42 ± 7%. Unresponsiveness to antitachycardia pacing and repetitive spontaneous re-initiation of the VT after defibrillation was the cause of frequent ineffective ICD interventions including repetitive ICD shocks in these patients. Using ICD interrogation, one or more episodes of a severe electrical storm (≥3 serial efficacious ICD shocks within 15 min) were more frequently documented in patients with nonreentrant VTs (10/12) than in patients with scar-related reentrant VTs (36/115). The origin of the nonreentrant VT was the left ventricular outflow tract in seven patients, the right ventricular outflow tract in three patients, and the tricuspid and mitral annulus in each one patient. Catheter ablation including epicardial mapping in 2 patients eliminated the nonreentrant VT in 11 of 12 patients and prevented recurrent VT storm.
Repetitive nonreentrant VTs may be ineffectively treated by ICD interventions and can be the cause of an electrical storm in different cardiomyopathies.
非折返性室性心动过速(VT)起源于无结构性心脏病的心脏,但偶尔也会发生在植入了植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)的不同心肌病患者中。
在一系列142例患有结构性心脏病且因复发性或持续性单形性室性心动过速接受消融治疗的ICD植入患者中,识别出非折返性室性心动过速。
非折返性室性心动过速是12例患者(8.4%)恰当ICD干预的原因。潜在的心脏病包括8例非缺血性心肌病、2例既往心肌梗死和2例瓣膜性心肌病,平均左心室射血分数为42±7%。对抗心动过速起搏无反应以及除颤后室性心动过速反复自发重新启动是这些患者频繁进行无效ICD干预(包括反复ICD电击)的原因。通过ICD问询,非折返性室性心动过速患者(10/12)比瘢痕相关折返性室性心动过速患者(36/115)更频繁地记录到一次或多次严重电风暴发作(15分钟内≥3次连续有效ICD电击)。非折返性室性心动过速的起源在7例患者中为左心室流出道,3例患者中为右心室流出道,各有1例患者起源于三尖瓣和二尖瓣环。包括2例患者进行心外膜标测在内的导管消融使12例患者中的11例非折返性室性心动过速消失,并预防了室性心动过速风暴复发。
反复的非折返性室性心动过速可能无法通过ICD干预得到有效治疗,并且可能是不同心肌病中电风暴的原因。