• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健问诊中的动机性访谈技巧(MISHCE):一种评估工具的开发与心理测量测试

Motivational Interviewing Skills in Health Care Encounters (MISHCE): Development and psychometric testing of an assessment tool.

作者信息

Petrova Tatjana, Kavookjian Jan, Madson Michael B, Dagley John, Shannon David, McDonough Sharon K

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Chicago State University, Chicago, IL, USA.

Department of Health Outcomes Research and Policy, Harrison School of Pharmacy, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.

出版信息

Res Social Adm Pharm. 2015 Sep-Oct;11(5):696-707. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2014.12.001. Epub 2014 Dec 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2014.12.001
PMID:25622994
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Motivational interviewing (MI) has demonstrated a significant impact as an intervention strategy for addiction management, change in lifestyle behaviors, and adherence to prescribed medication and other treatments. Key elements to studying MI include training in MI of professionals who will use it, assessment of skills acquisition in trainees, and the use of a validated skills assessment tool.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this research project was to develop a psychometrically valid and reliable tool that has been designed to assess MI skills competence in health care provider trainees. The goal was to develop an assessment tool that would evaluate the acquisition and use of specific MI skills and principles, as well as the quality of the patient-provider therapeutic alliance in brief health care encounters.

METHODS

To address this purpose, specific steps were followed, beginning with a literature review. This review contributed to the development of relevant conceptual and operational definitions, selecting a scaling technique and response format, and methods for analyzing validity and reliability. Internal consistency reliability was established on 88 video recorded interactions. The inter-rater and test-retest reliability were established using randomly selected 18 from the 88 interactions. The assessment tool Motivational Interviewing Skills for Health Care Encounters (MISHCE) and a manual for use of the tool were developed.

RESULTS

Validity and reliability of MISHCE were examined. Face and content validity were supported with well-defined conceptual and operational definitions and feedback from an expert panel. Reliability was established through internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, and test-retest reliability. The overall internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha) for all fifteen items was 0.75. MISHCE demonstrated good inter-rater reliability and good to excellent test-retest reliability.

CONCLUSION

MISHCE assesses the health provider's level of knowledge and skills in brief disease management encounters. MISHCE also evaluates quality of the patient-provider therapeutic alliance, i.e., the "flow" of the interaction.

摘要

背景

动机性访谈(MI)作为一种干预策略,在成瘾管理、生活方式行为改变以及遵医嘱用药和接受其他治疗方面已显示出重大影响。研究MI的关键要素包括对将使用它的专业人员进行MI培训、评估学员的技能掌握情况以及使用经过验证的技能评估工具。

目的

本研究项目的目的是开发一种心理测量学上有效且可靠的工具,该工具旨在评估医疗保健提供者学员的MI技能能力。目标是开发一种评估工具,以评估特定MI技能和原则的掌握与运用情况,以及在简短的医疗保健接触中患者与提供者治疗联盟的质量。

方法

为实现这一目的,采取了具体步骤,首先进行了文献综述。该综述有助于制定相关的概念和操作定义、选择量表技术和反应格式以及分析效度和信度的方法。在88次视频记录的互动中建立了内部一致性信度。使用从88次互动中随机选择的18次互动建立了评分者间信度和重测信度。开发了评估工具《医疗保健接触中的动机性访谈技能》(MISHCE)及其使用手册。

结果

对MISHCE的效度和信度进行了检验。明确的概念和操作定义以及专家小组的反馈支持了表面效度和内容效度。通过内部一致性、评分者间信度和重测信度建立了信度。所有15个项目的总体内部一致性信度(Cronbach's alpha)为0.75。MISHCE显示出良好的评分者间信度和良好至优秀的重测信度。

结论

MISHCE评估医疗保健提供者在简短疾病管理接触中的知识和技能水平。MISHCE还评估患者与提供者治疗联盟的质量,即互动的“流畅性”。

相似文献

1
Motivational Interviewing Skills in Health Care Encounters (MISHCE): Development and psychometric testing of an assessment tool.医疗保健问诊中的动机性访谈技巧(MISHCE):一种评估工具的开发与心理测量测试
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2015 Sep-Oct;11(5):696-707. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2014.12.001. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
2
Measuring the quality of motivational interviewing in primary health care encounters: The development and validation of the motivational interviewing assessment scale (MIAS).衡量初级卫生保健诊疗中动机性访谈的质量:动机性访谈评估量表(MIAS)的开发与验证
Eur J Gen Pract. 2016 Sep;22(3):182-8. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2016.1177508. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
3
Is the Scale for Measuring Motivational Interviewing Skills a valid and reliable instrument for measuring the primary care professionals motivational skills?: EVEM study protocol.《测量动机访谈技巧量表是否为测量初级保健专业人员动机技巧的有效可靠工具?》:EVEM 研究方案。
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Nov 22;13:112. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-112.
4
Development of motivational interviewing skills in immunization (MISI): a questionnaire to assess MI learning, knowledge and skills for vaccination promotion.促进免疫接种的动机性访谈技能发展(MISI):评估用于疫苗接种推广的 MI 学习、知识和技能的问卷。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15(10):2446-2452. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1586030. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
5
[Psychometric characteristics of questionnaires designed to assess the knowledge, perceptions and practices of health care professionals with regards to alcoholic patients].[旨在评估医护人员对酒精依赖患者的知识、认知及实践情况的调查问卷的心理测量学特征]
Encephale. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):437-46. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95458-9.
6
Validation of the one pass measure for motivational interviewing competence.动机性访谈能力单次测量法的验证
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Apr;98(4):499-505. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.12.014. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
7
Development and reliability of a Motivational Interviewing Scenarios Tool for Eating Disorders (MIST-ED) using a skills-based intervention among caregivers.基于技能干预的照顾者使用动机式晤谈情境工具评估进食障碍(MIST-ED)的开发与信度研究。
Eat Behav. 2013 Dec;14(4):432-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2013.07.010. Epub 2013 Jul 21.
8
The video assessment of simulated encounters (VASE): Development and validation of a group-administered method for evaluating clinician skills in motivational interviewing.模拟问诊的视频评估(VASE):一种用于评估临床医生动机性访谈技能的团体施测方法的开发与验证
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005 Sep 1;79(3):321-30. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.02.004. Epub 2005 Mar 29.
9
Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Chinese Feeding Difficulty Index (Ch-FDI) for People with Dementia.痴呆症患者中文进食困难指数(Ch-FDI)的开发与心理测量评估
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 21;10(7):e0133716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133716. eCollection 2015.
10
Coding counsellor behaviour in motivational interviewing sessions: inter-rater reliability for the Swedish Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity Code (MITI).动机性访谈环节中编码咨询顾问行为:瑞典动机性访谈治疗完整性编码(MITI)的评分者间信度
Cogn Behav Ther. 2007;36(3):162-9. doi: 10.1080/16506070701339887.

引用本文的文献

1
Multidisciplinary team perceptions of the Case/Care Managers' role implementation: a qualitative study.多学科团队对个案/护理经理角色实施的看法:一项定性研究。
Acta Biomed. 2022 Jul 1;93(3):e2022259. doi: 10.23750/abm.v93i3.13371.
2
Impact of motivational interviewing as a follow-up to an exercise intervention among women with or at risk for metabolic syndrome: A randomized controlled trial.动机性访谈对代谢综合征女性患者或有代谢综合征风险女性运动干预后的影响:一项随机对照试验。
SAGE Open Med. 2022 Jan 15;10:20503121211073434. doi: 10.1177/20503121211073434. eCollection 2022.
3
Predisposition for Empathy, Intercultural Sensitivity, and Intentions for Using Motivational Interviewing in First Year Pharmacy Students.
同理心倾向、跨文化敏感性与动机性访谈意向在第一年药学学生中的表现。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 Oct;81(8):5989. doi: 10.5688/ajpe5989.