Sinuff Tasnim, Dodek Peter, You John J, Barwich Doris, Tayler Carolyn, Downar James, Hartwick Michael, Frank Christopher, Stelfox Henry T, Heyland Daren K
Department of Critical Care Medicine and Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Center for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences and Division of Critical Care Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Jun;49(6):1070-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.12.007. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
The goal of end-of-life (EOL) communication and decision making is to create a shared understanding about a person's values and treatment preferences that will lead to a plan of care that is consistent with these values and preferences. Improvements in communication and decision making at the EOL have been identified as a high priority from a patient and family point of view.
The purpose of this study was to develop quality indicators related to EOL communication and decision making.
We convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts to develop definitions, a conceptual framework of EOL communication and decision making, and quality indicators using a modified Delphi method. We generated a list of potential items based on literature review and input from panel members. Panel members rated the items using a seven-point Likert scale (1 = very little importance to 7 = extremely important) over four rounds of review until consensus was achieved.
About 24 of the 28 panel members participated in all four rounds of the Delphi process. The final list of quality indicators comprised 34 items, divided into the four categories of our conceptual framework: Advance care planning (eight items), Goals of care discussions (13 items), Documentation (five items), and Organization/System aspects (eight items). Eleven items were rated "extremely important" (median score). All items had a median score of five (moderately important) or greater.
We have developed definitions, a conceptual framework, and quality indicators that researchers and health care decision makers can use to evaluate and improve the quality of EOL communication and decision making.
临终(EOL)沟通与决策的目标是就个人价值观和治疗偏好达成共同理解,从而制定出与这些价值观和偏好相一致的护理计划。从患者及其家属的角度来看,改善临终阶段的沟通与决策已被确定为高度优先事项。
本研究的目的是制定与临终沟通和决策相关的质量指标。
我们召集了一个多学科专家小组,使用改良的德尔菲法来制定定义、临终沟通与决策的概念框架以及质量指标。我们根据文献综述和小组成员的意见生成了一份潜在项目清单。小组成员在四轮评审中使用七点李克特量表(1 = 非常不重要至7 = 极其重要)对项目进行评分,直至达成共识。
28名小组成员中约有24人参与了德尔菲法的所有四轮评审。质量指标的最终清单包括34项,分为我们概念框架的四个类别:预先护理计划(8项)、护理目标讨论(13项)、记录(5项)以及组织/系统方面(8项)。11项被评为“极其重要”(中位数得分)。所有项目的中位数得分均为5(中等重要)或更高。
我们已经制定了定义、概念框架和质量指标,研究人员和医疗保健决策者可利用这些来评估和改善临终沟通与决策的质量。