• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将沟通技巧转移到工作场所:为放射治疗团队设计的 38 小时沟通技巧培训计划的影响。

Transfer of communication skills to the workplace: impact of a 38-hour communication skills training program designed for radiotherapy teams.

机构信息

Isabelle Merckaert, France Delevallez, Anne-Sophie Gibon, Aurore Liénard, Yves Libert, Nicole Delvaux, Paul Van Houtte, and Darius Razavi, Université Libre de Bruxelles; Isabelle Merckaert, Anne-Sophie Gibon, Aurore Liénard, Yves Libert, Paul Van Houtte, and Darius Razavi, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles; Nicole Delvaux, Hôpital Universitaire Erasme; Serge Marchal and Jean-Louis Slachmuylder, Centre de Psycho-Oncologie; Christine Reynaert and Pierre Scalliet, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels; and Anne-Marie Etienne, Isabelle Bragard, and Philippe Coucke, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 10;33(8):901-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.3287. Epub 2015 Jan 26.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.2014.57.3287
PMID:25624435
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study assessed the efficacy of a 38-hour communication skills training program designed to train a multidisciplinary radiotherapy team.

METHODS

Four radiotherapy teams were randomly assigned to a training program or a waiting list. Assessments were scheduled at baseline and after training for the training group and at baseline and 4 months later for the waiting list group. Assessments included an audio recording of a radiotherapy planning session to assess team members' communication skills and expression of concerns of patients with breast cancer (analyzed with content analysis software) and an adapted European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer satisfaction with care questionnaire completed by patients at the end of radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-seven radiotherapy planning sessions were recorded. Compared with members of the untrained teams, members of the trained teams acquired, over time, more assessment skills (P = .003) and more supportive skills (P = .050) and provided more setting information (P = .010). Over time, patients interacting with members of the trained teams asked more open questions (P = .022), expressed more emotional words (P = .025), and exhibited a higher satisfaction level regarding nurses' interventions (P = .028).

CONCLUSION

The 38-hour training program facilitated transfer of team member learned communication skills to the clinical practice and improved patients' satisfaction with care.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了一项旨在培训多学科放射治疗团队的 38 小时沟通技巧培训计划的疗效。

方法

将四个放射治疗团队随机分配到培训计划或候补名单。评估计划在基线和培训组的培训后进行,在基线和候补名单组的 4 个月后进行。评估包括记录一次放射治疗计划会议的音频,以评估团队成员的沟通技巧和表达乳腺癌患者的担忧(使用内容分析软件进行分析),以及在放射治疗结束时由患者完成的经改编的欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织满意度护理问卷。

结果

共记录了 237 次放射治疗计划会议。与未经培训的团队成员相比,经过培训的团队成员随着时间的推移获得了更多的评估技能(P =.003)和更多的支持技能(P =.050),并提供了更多的环境信息(P =.010)。随着时间的推移,与接受培训的团队成员互动的患者提出了更多的开放性问题(P =.022),表达了更多的情感词汇(P =.025),并对护士干预的满意度更高(P =.028)。

结论

38 小时的培训计划促进了团队成员学习的沟通技巧转移到临床实践中,并提高了患者对护理的满意度。

相似文献

1
Transfer of communication skills to the workplace: impact of a 38-hour communication skills training program designed for radiotherapy teams.将沟通技巧转移到工作场所:为放射治疗团队设计的 38 小时沟通技巧培训计划的影响。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 10;33(8):901-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.3287. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
2
Is it possible to improve radiotherapy team members' communication skills? A randomized study assessing the efficacy of a 38-h communication skills training program.是否有可能提高放疗团队成员的沟通技巧?一项评估 38 小时沟通技巧培训计划疗效的随机研究。
Radiother Oncol. 2013 Oct;109(1):170-7. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.08.019. Epub 2013 Sep 7.
3
Is it possible to improve communication around radiotherapy delivery: A randomized study to assess the efficacy of team training?是否有可能改善放射治疗过程中的沟通:一项评估团队培训效果的随机研究?
Radiother Oncol. 2016 May;119(2):361-7. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.03.016. Epub 2016 Apr 9.
4
Physicians' communication with a cancer patient and a relative: a randomized study assessing the efficacy of consolidation workshops.医生与癌症患者及其亲属的沟通:一项评估强化研讨会效果的随机研究。
Cancer. 2005 Jun 1;103(11):2397-411. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21093.
5
How to optimize physicians' communication skills in cancer care: results of a randomized study assessing the usefulness of posttraining consolidation workshops.如何在癌症护理中优化医生的沟通技巧:一项评估培训后巩固研讨会效用的随机研究结果
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Aug 15;21(16):3141-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.08.031.
6
Factors that influence physicians' detection of distress in patients with cancer: can a communication skills training program improve physicians' detection?影响医生对癌症患者痛苦察觉的因素:沟通技能培训项目能否提高医生的察觉能力?
Cancer. 2005 Jul 15;104(2):411-21. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21172.
7
Transfer of communication skills to the workplace during clinical rounds: impact of a program for residents.临床查房中沟通技巧向工作场所的转移:一项针对住院医师的计划的影响。
PLoS One. 2010 Aug 26;5(8):e12426. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012426.
8
Transfer of communication skills training from workshop to workplace: the impact of clinical supervision.沟通技能培训从工作坊向工作场所的转移:临床督导的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Mar;60(3):313-25. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.08.008. Epub 2005 Oct 19.
9
The impact of patient and physician computer mediated communication skill training on reported communication and patient satisfaction.患者和医生计算机介导沟通技能培训对报告沟通和患者满意度的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Sep;88(3):406-13. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.020. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
10
Evaluation of an integrated communication skills training program for nurses in cancer care in Beijing, China.中国北京针对癌症护理护士的综合沟通技能培训项目评估
Nurs Res. 2007 May-Jun;56(3):202-9. doi: 10.1097/01.NNR.0000270030.82736.8c.

引用本文的文献

1
Rethinking parameters of "success" in breaking bad news conversations from patient's perspective: the successful delivery process model.重新思考从患者角度来看打破坏消息对话中“成功”的参数:成功传递过程模型。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Feb 22;32(3):181. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08354-0.
2
Doing the hard work of learning: oncologists' enduring impressions of a year-long communication skills training program.付出学习的艰苦努力:肿瘤学家对为期一年的沟通技能培训项目的持久印象。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Dec 30;32(1):71. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-08285-2.
3
Training of radiotherapy professionals: status, content, satisfaction and improvement suggestions in the Greater Region.
放疗专业人员培训:大地区的现状、内容、满意度和改进建议。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jun 22;22(1):485. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03567-5.
4
Using Co-design With Breast Cancer Patients and Radiographers to Develop "KEW" Communication Skills Training.与乳腺癌患者和放射技师共同设计,以开发“KEW”沟通技能培训。
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 22;12:629122. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.629122. eCollection 2021.
5
The Impact of a Communication Skills Workshop on Doctors' Behavior Over Time.沟通技巧研讨会对医生行为的长期影响。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2020 Apr 15;11:289-294. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S216642. eCollection 2020.
6
Can Patient-Provider Interpersonal Interventions Achieve the Quadruple Aim of Healthcare? A Systematic Review.医患人际干预能否实现医疗保健的四重目标?系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jul;35(7):2107-2117. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05525-2. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
7
Design and Psychometric Evaluation of the 'Clinical Communication Self-Efficacy Toolkit'.《临床沟通自我效能工具包》的设计与心理计量学评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 16;16(22):4534. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224534.
8
Communication interventions in adult and pediatric oncology: A scoping review and analysis of behavioral targets.成人和儿科肿瘤学中的沟通干预措施:行为目标的范围综述和分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 22;14(8):e0221536. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221536. eCollection 2019.
9
Outcomes and outcome measures used in evaluation of communication training in oncology - a systematic literature review, an expert workshop, and recommendations for future research.评估肿瘤学中沟通培训的结果和结果衡量指标——系统文献回顾、专家研讨会以及对未来研究的建议。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Aug 14;19(1):808. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6022-5.
10
The Effect of Reflection on Nurse-Patient Communication Skills in Emergency Medical Centers.反思对急诊医疗中心护士与患者沟通技巧的影响。
J Caring Sci. 2019 Jun 1;8(2):75-81. doi: 10.15171/jcs.2019.011. eCollection 2019 Jun.