• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牵张成骨术在额面部前移中的应用:长期回顾

Frontofacial advancement by distraction osteogenesis: a long-term review.

作者信息

Gwanmesia Ivo, Jeelani Owase, Hayward Richard, Dunaway David

机构信息

London, United Kingdom From the Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Feb;135(2):553-560. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001115.

DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000001115
PMID:25626799
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Frontofacial advancement by distraction osteogenesis is known to produce significant functional and aesthetic gains in the short and medium term. Little is known about the long-term effects of this technique. The authors present a long-term review of frontofacial advancement by distraction in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis.

METHODS

In 2008, Witherow et al. presented functional outcomes in 20 consecutive patients who underwent frontofacial advancement by distraction osteogenesis using the rigid external distractor frame. This retrospective study has revisited the outcomes in these patients after a mean follow-up period of 10.2 years.

RESULTS

Records for the original 20 patients were assessed. Cephalometric analysis demonstrated stable advancements over the long term. No patient achieved any anterior growth of the midface after frontofacial advancement. Long-term follow-up demonstrated a later deterioration of respiratory function in the younger group of patients (36.4 percent). Four patients required adenotonsillectomy. One patient has a persistent tracheostomy. Only one patient required further procedures to correct recurrent raised intracranial pressure. None of the patients in the older group experienced a deterioration of function. Other procedures included reduction of the supraorbital ridge, bimaxillary osteotomies, and rhinoplasties.

CONCLUSIONS

Frontofacial distraction produced long-term stable advancement in all cases, and 15 of the 17 living patients (88.2 percent) achieved stable functional gains. Anterior growth of the midface does not occur following monobloc distraction. Deterioration in function is seen in those who undergo this procedure at a young age. The authors recommend regular follow-up of these patients.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

摘要

背景

已知通过牵张成骨进行额面部前移在短期和中期能带来显著的功能和美学改善。关于该技术的长期影响知之甚少。作者对综合征性颅缝早闭患者通过牵张进行额面部前移进行了长期回顾。

方法

2008年,威瑟罗等人报告了20例连续接受使用刚性外部牵张器框架进行牵张成骨额面部前移患者的功能结果。这项回顾性研究在平均随访10.2年后重新评估了这些患者的结果。

结果

对最初20例患者的记录进行了评估。头影测量分析显示长期前移稳定。额面部前移后,没有患者实现面中部的任何向前生长。长期随访显示,较年轻患者组(36.4%)的呼吸功能在后期恶化。4例患者需要行腺样体扁桃体切除术。1例患者持续进行气管造口术。只有1例患者需要进一步手术来纠正复发性颅内压升高。老年组患者均未出现功能恶化。其他手术包括眶上嵴降低术、双颌截骨术和鼻整形术。

结论

额面部牵张在所有病例中均产生了长期稳定的前移,17例在世患者中有15例(88.2%)实现了稳定的功能改善。整块牵张后面中部不会向前生长。在年轻时接受该手术的患者中可见功能恶化。作者建议对这些患者进行定期随访。

临床问题/证据水平:治疗性,IV级。

相似文献

1
Frontofacial advancement by distraction osteogenesis: a long-term review.牵张成骨术在额面部前移中的应用:长期回顾
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Feb;135(2):553-560. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001115.
2
Long-Term Follow-Up on Bone Stability and Complication Rate after Monobloc Advancement in Syndromic Craniosynostosis.综合征型颅缝早闭单骨瓣推进术后的骨稳定性和并发症发生率的长期随访
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Apr;145(4):1025-1034. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006646.
3
Frontofacial monobloc distraction in the very young: a review of 12 consecutive cases.面中部骨块牵张成骨术在非常年幼的患者中的应用:连续 12 例病例的回顾性研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Mar;129(3):488e-497e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182412820.
4
Respiratory outcome of midface advancement with distraction: a comparison between Le Fort III and frontofacial monobloc.牵张成骨进行面中部前移的呼吸结局:勒福Ⅲ型截骨术与全颜面整块截骨术的比较
J Craniofac Surg. 2006 Jul;17(4):642-4. doi: 10.1097/00001665-200607000-00006.
5
Complications in 54 frontofacial distraction procedures in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis.54例综合征性颅缝早闭患者行额面部牵张成骨术的并发症
J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Jan;26(1):124-8. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001320.
6
Monobloc Frontofacial or Le Fort III Distraction Osteogenesis in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Treatment Outcome and the Need for Central Distraction.综合征性颅缝早闭的整块额面或勒福Ⅲ型牵张成骨术:治疗效果的三维评估及中央牵张的必要性
J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Jul;28(5):1344-1349. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003570.
7
Relapse following frontofacial advancement using the rigid external distractor.使用坚固外部牵张器进行额面部前移后的复发情况。
J Craniofac Surg. 2008 Jan;19(1):113-20. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31815cddc8.
8
Craniosynostosis: Monobloc Distraction with Internal Device and Its Variant for Infants with Severe Syndromic Craniosynostosis.颅缝早闭:使用内置装置的整块骨切开术及其在严重综合征性颅缝早闭婴儿中的变异型。
Clin Plast Surg. 2021 Jul;48(3):497-506. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2021.02.008. Epub 2021 May 8.
9
Respiratory outcome of mid-face advancement with distraction: a comparison between Le Fort III and frontofacial monobloc.牵张成骨进行面中部前移后的呼吸结局:勒福III型截骨术与面中部整块截骨术的比较
J Craniofac Surg. 2006 Sep;17(5):880-2. doi: 10.1097/01.scs.0000221520.95540.a5.
10
Midface Morphology and Growth in Syndromic Craniosynostosis Patients Following Frontofacial Monobloc Distraction.综合征型颅缝早闭患者经额眶颅面骨整块牵张术后的中面部形态和生长变化。
J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(1):87-91. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006997.

引用本文的文献

1
Midface Morphology and Growth in Syndromic Craniosynostosis Patients Following Frontofacial Monobloc Distraction.综合征型颅缝早闭患者经额眶颅面骨整块牵张术后的中面部形态和生长变化。
J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(1):87-91. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006997.