Pinho J B, Marini M A
Núcleo de Pesquisas Ecológicas do Pantanal - NEPA, Departamento de Biologia e Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso - UFMT, Cuiabá, MT, Brazil.
Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas - IB, Universidade de Brasília - UnB, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Braz J Biol. 2014 Nov;74(4):890-8. doi: 10.1590/1519-6984.08713. Epub 2014 Nov 1.
We tested the heterogeneity/productivity hypothesis with respect to the abundance and richness of birds and the vegetation density hypothesis with respect to birds' nest predation rates, and determined the relative importance of forested vegetation formations for the conservation of birds in the Pantanal. We estimated the apparent nesting success, and the abundance and richness of nesting birds' in four forest types, by monitoring nests during two reproductive seasons in four forested physiognomies (two high productivity/heterogeneity evergreen forests = Cambará and Landi; two low productivity/heterogeneity dry forests = Cordilheira and Carvoeiro) in the Pantanal wetland in Poconé, State of Mato Grosso, Brazil. We found 381 nests of 46 species (35 Passeriformes and 11 non-Passeriformes) in the four forest types. Of these, we monitored 220 active nests belonging to 44 species, 101 during the reproductive season of 2001 and 119 in 2002. We supported the productivity/heterogeneity hypothesis since the two evergreen forests had higher nest abundance and one of them (Cambará) had higher nesting species richness than the dry forests. The number of nests found in each habitat differed with most nests monitored in the Cambará forest (82%), followed by Landi (9%), Cordilheira (6%) and Carvoeiro (3%) forests. The total number of nests monitored was significantly higher in evergreen forests than in dry forests. Also, more species nested in evergreen (37 species) than in dry (16 species) forests. A Correspondence Analysis revealed that only Carvoeiros had a different nesting bird community. The overall apparent nesting success of 220 nests was 26.8%. We did not support the vegetation density hypothesis since nest predation rates were similar between evergreen (73.5%) and dry (70%) forests, and were higher in the Landi (85%) than in the other three forests (69.2 to 72.2%). Our data indicate that Cambará forests seem to be a key nesting habitat for many bird species of the Pantanal. If this local pattern also occurs in other regions of the Pantanal, the use and management of Cambará forests might prove to be important for the conservation of forest birds of this biome. However, conflicting results with other taxonomic groups show that conservation measures for these forests and land use policies should be based on a more complete biodiversity evaluation of the region.
我们针对鸟类的丰富度和物种丰富度检验了异质性/生产力假说,针对鸟巢被捕食率检验了植被密度假说,并确定了森林植被类型对于潘塔纳尔湿地鸟类保护的相对重要性。我们通过在巴西马托格罗索州波科内的潘塔纳尔湿地的四种森林地貌(两种高生产力/异质性常绿森林 = 坎巴拉和兰迪;两种低生产力/异质性干燥森林 = 科尔迪耶拉和卡沃埃罗)的两个繁殖季节监测鸟巢,估算了四种森林类型中鸟巢的表观成功率、筑巢鸟类的丰富度和物种丰富度。我们在四种森林类型中发现了46种鸟类的381个鸟巢(35种雀形目和11种非雀形目)。其中,我们监测了属于44个物种的220个活跃鸟巢,2001年繁殖季节监测了101个,2002年监测了119个。我们支持生产力/异质性假说,因为这两种常绿森林的鸟巢数量更多,其中一种(坎巴拉)筑巢物种丰富度高于干燥森林。每个栖息地发现的鸟巢数量不同,在坎巴拉森林中监测到的鸟巢最多(82%),其次是兰迪森林(9%)、科尔迪耶拉森林(6%)和卡沃埃罗森林(3%)。常绿森林中监测到的鸟巢总数显著高于干燥森林。此外,在常绿森林中筑巢的物种(37种)比在干燥森林中(16种)更多。对应分析表明,只有卡沃埃罗森林有不同的筑巢鸟类群落。220个鸟巢的总体表观成功率为26.8%。我们不支持植被密度假说,因为常绿森林(73.5%)和干燥森林(70%)的鸟巢被捕食率相似,兰迪森林(85%)的被捕食率高于其他三种森林(69.2%至72.2%)。我们的数据表明,坎巴拉森林似乎是潘塔纳尔湿地许多鸟类的关键筑巢栖息地。如果这种局部模式也出现在潘塔纳尔湿地的其他地区,那么坎巴拉森林的利用和管理可能对该生物群落森林鸟类的保护至关重要。然而,与其他分类群的矛盾结果表明,这些森林的保护措施和土地利用政策应基于对该地区更全面的生物多样性评估。