Pithon Matheus Melo, dos Santos Elinailton Silva
Department of Orthodontics, State University of Southwestern Bahia.
Dental Press J Orthod. 2014 Nov-Dec;19(6):86-92. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.19.6.086-092.oar. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
Investigate the quality of data available on the internet with respect to pain after orthognathic surgery.
A careful search was conducted on the Internet in December, 2012. The most accessed websites browsers were employed for research using the terms: "pain" and "orthognathic surgery" together. The first 30 results of each portal were examined, and after applying the exclusion criteria, 29 sites remained. All remaining websites went through an evaluation process with online tools that investigated the quality, level of reading, accessibility, usability and reliability.
Assessment criteria outcomes were considered unfavorable. Texts were considered difficult to read with inappropriate language for the general public. The mean global validation for the 29 websites of the LIDA instrument was 65.10, thereby indicating a structure of medium quality.
Information about post-orthognathic surgery pain available on the internet is poorly written and unreliable. Therefore, candidates for orthognathic surgery must seek information from specialists who, in turn, should indicate reliable sources.
调查互联网上有关正颌外科手术后疼痛的可用数据质量。
2012年12月在互联网上进行了仔细搜索。使用最常访问的网站浏览器,将“疼痛”和“正颌外科手术”这两个术语一起用于研究。检查了每个门户网站的前30个结果,应用排除标准后,剩下29个网站。所有剩余网站都通过在线工具进行了评估,该工具调查了质量、阅读水平、可访问性、可用性和可靠性。
评估标准结果被认为不理想。文本被认为难以阅读,语言不适合普通大众。LIDA工具对29个网站的平均总体验证率为65.10,表明质量结构中等。
互联网上有关正颌外科手术后疼痛的信息撰写不佳且不可靠。因此,正颌外科手术候选人必须从专家那里获取信息,而专家反过来应指出可靠的来源。