Wesner Jeff S, Meyers Peter, Billman Eric J, Belk Mark C
Department of Biology, University of South Dakota Vermillion, South Dakota, 57069.
Department of Biology, Brigham Young University Provo, Utah, 84602.
Ecol Evol. 2015 Jan;5(1):121-9. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1256. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
Predator community composition can alter habitat quality for prey by changing the strength and direction of consumptive effects. Whether predator community composition also alters prey density via nonconsumptive effects during habitat selection is not well known, but is important for understanding how changes to predator communities will alter prey populations. We tested the hypothesis that predator community composition (presence of caged trout, caged dragonflies, or caged trout + dragonflies) alters colonization of aquatic mesocosms by ovipositing aquatic insects. In a previous experiment in this system, we found a spatial contagion effect, in which insects avoided pools with predators, but only when predator-free pools were isolated (∼5 m away from predator pools). Here, we removed the isolated predator-free pools, allowing us to test whether insects would make fine-scale (∼1 m) oviposition decisions in the absence of preferred isolated pools. We also estimated consumptive effects by allowing predators to feed on colonists for 5 days following colonization. All insects collected after 21 days were dipterans, dominated by Chironomidae. Total colonization, measured as the number of developing larvae after 21 days, was not affected by either predator presence or composition. Consumption was significant in the trout only treatment, reducing larval insect density by 46 ± 37% (mean ± SE). No other predator treatment significantly reduced prey density, although the proportion of chironomid larvae in protective cases increased in response to direct predation from dragonflies, indicating an antipredatory behavioral response. Taken together, these results reveal that predator community composition altered larval survival and behavior, but colonizing females either did not or could not assess these risks across small scales during oviposition.
捕食者群落组成可以通过改变消费效应的强度和方向来改变猎物的栖息地质量。捕食者群落组成是否也会在栖息地选择过程中通过非消费效应改变猎物密度,目前尚不清楚,但这对于理解捕食者群落的变化将如何改变猎物种群至关重要。我们检验了这样一个假设:捕食者群落组成(有笼养鳟鱼、笼养蜻蜓或笼养鳟鱼 + 蜻蜓)会改变水生昆虫在水生中型生态系统中的定殖情况。在该系统之前的一项实验中,我们发现了一种空间传染效应,即昆虫会避开有捕食者的水池,但只有在无捕食者的水池被隔离(距离捕食者水池约5米)时才会这样。在这里,我们移除了隔离的无捕食者水池,从而能够测试昆虫在没有首选隔离水池的情况下是否会做出精细尺度(约1米)的产卵决策。我们还通过让捕食者在定殖后以定殖者为食5天来估计消费效应。21天后收集的所有昆虫均为双翅目,以摇蚊科为主。以21天后发育幼虫的数量衡量的总定殖情况,不受捕食者的存在或组成的影响。仅在鳟鱼处理中消费显著,幼虫昆虫密度降低了46±37%(平均值±标准误)。没有其他捕食者处理显著降低猎物密度,尽管摇蚊幼虫在保护壳中的比例因蜻蜓的直接捕食而增加,这表明存在反捕食行为反应。综合来看,这些结果表明捕食者群落组成改变了幼虫的生存和行为,但定殖的雌性在产卵期间要么没有,要么无法在小尺度上评估这些风险。