Baidya Dalim Kumar, Darlong Vanlal, Pandey Ravindra, Goswami Devalina, Maitra Souvik
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
J Emerg Med. 2015 May;48(5):590-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.07.062. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
Ultrasound (US)-guided short-axis approach for internal jugular vein (IJV) cannulation does not fully protect patients from inadvertent carotid artery (CA) puncture. Carotid puncture is not rare (occurring in up to 4% of all IJV cannulations) despite the use of US.
Compare the sonoanatomy of the "medial-oblique approach" probe position with the classic US-guided "short-axis" probe position, specifically: relation of internal CA and IJV; vertical and horizontal diameter of IJV; and degree of overlapping of IJV with CA.
One hundred consecutive patients between the ages of 18 and 50 years, both male and female, and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification system (ASA PS) I-II undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia were recruited in this prospective, randomized, crossover, parallel-group study.
The transverse diameter of the IJV was found to be significantly higher in the medial-oblique probe position (p = 0.000, mean difference 0.43 cm; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34-0.52). The percentage of overlap was also significantly lower in the medial-oblique probe position (48.7 ± 10.7% in short-axis vs. 36.3 ± 13.2% in medial-oblique probe position; p = 0.000; mean difference 12.4%, 95% CI 9.1-15.8). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the anteroposterior diameter of the IJV between the two probe positions (1.11 ± 0.26 cm in short axis vs 1.07 ± 0.25 cm in medial oblique; p = 0.631).
The medial-oblique probe position for IJV cannulation provides sonoanatomic superiority over the classic short-axis probe position. Further randomized, controlled trials may confirm the medial-oblique view's clinical benefit in the future.
超声(US)引导下采用短轴进针方法进行颈内静脉(IJV)置管并不能完全避免患者发生意外的颈动脉(CA)穿刺。尽管使用了超声,但颈动脉穿刺并不罕见(在所有颈内静脉置管中发生率高达4%)。
比较“内侧斜位进针”探头位置与经典超声引导下“短轴”探头位置的超声解剖结构,具体包括:颈内动脉与颈内静脉的关系;颈内静脉的垂直和水平直径;以及颈内静脉与颈动脉的重叠程度。
本前瞻性、随机、交叉、平行组研究纳入了100例年龄在18至50岁之间、性别不限、美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分类系统(ASA PS)为I-II级、接受全身麻醉下择期手术的患者。
发现内侧斜位探头位置时颈内静脉的横径显著更高(p = 0.000,平均差值0.43 cm;95%置信区间[CI] 0.34 - 0.52)。内侧斜位探头位置时的重叠百分比也显著更低(短轴进针时为48.7 ± 10.7%,内侧斜位探头位置时为36.3 ± 13.2%;p = 0.000;平均差值12.4%,95% CI 9.1 - 15.8)。然而,两个探头位置之间颈内静脉的前后径无统计学显著差异(短轴进针时为1.11 ± 0.26 cm,内侧斜位时为1.07 ± 0.25 cm;p = 0.631)。
颈内静脉置管时的内侧斜位探头位置在超声解剖结构上优于经典的短轴探头位置。未来进一步的随机对照试验可能会证实内侧斜位视图的临床益处。