Li Ting, Anderson James J
a Renmin University of China.
Popul Stud (Camb). 2015;69(1):91-104. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2014.992358. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
The Strehler and Mildvan (SM) general theory of ageing and mortality provides a mechanism-based explanation of Gompertz's law and predicts a log-linear relationship between the two Gompertz coefficients, known as the SM correlation. While the SM correlation is supported by data from developed countries before the second half of the twentieth century, the recent breakdown of the correlation pattern in these countries has prompted demographers to conclude that SM theory needs to be reassessed. In this paper we use a newly developed two-process vitality model to explain the SM correlation and its breakdown in terms of asynchronous trends in acute (extrinsic) and chronic (intrinsic) mortality factors. We propose that the mortality change in the first half of the twentieth century is largely determined by the elimination of immediate hazards to death, whereas the mortality change in the second half is primarily driven by the slowdown of the deterioration rate of intrinsic survival capacity.
斯特勒勒和米尔德万(SM)的衰老与死亡率通用理论为冈珀茨定律提供了基于机制的解释,并预测了两个冈珀茨系数之间的对数线性关系,即所谓的SM相关性。虽然20世纪下半叶之前发达国家的数据支持了SM相关性,但这些国家近期相关性模式的瓦解促使人口统计学家得出结论,认为需要重新评估SM理论。在本文中,我们使用一种新开发的双过程活力模型,从急性(外在)和慢性(内在)死亡因素的异步趋势角度来解释SM相关性及其瓦解。我们认为,20世纪上半叶的死亡率变化在很大程度上是由对死亡的直接危害的消除所决定的,而20世纪下半叶的死亡率变化主要是由内在生存能力退化速率的放缓所驱动的。