• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Radial Scar at Image-guided Needle Biopsy: Is Excision Necessary?影像引导下穿刺活检时的放射状瘢痕:是否需要切除?
Am J Surg Pathol. 2015 Jun;39(6):779-85. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000393.
2
Upgrade risk of image-targeted radial scar and complex sclerosing lesions diagnosed at needle-guided biopsy: a retrospective study.在经皮引导活检诊断的影像目标性放射状瘢痕和复杂硬化性病变中升级的风险:一项回顾性研究。
Eur Radiol. 2023 Dec;33(12):8399-8406. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09877-6. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
3
Meta-analysis of upgrade rates in 3163 radial scars excised after needle core biopsy diagnosis.经皮穿刺芯针活检诊断后切除的 3163 例放射状瘢痕升级率的荟萃分析。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Feb;174(1):165-177. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-5040-3. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
4
Clinical and Radiologic Follow-up Study for Biopsy Diagnosis of Radial Scar/Radial Sclerosing Lesion without Other Atypia.无其他异型性的放射状瘢痕/放射状硬化性病变活检诊断的临床及影像学随访研究
Breast J. 2016 Nov;22(6):637-644. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12645. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
5
Radial scar of the breast: Is it possible to avoid surgery?乳腺放射状瘢痕:能否避免手术?
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Jul;43(7):1265-1272. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.01.238. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
6
Outcome of radial scar/complex sclerosing lesion associated with epithelial proliferations with atypia diagnosed on breast core biopsy: results from a multicentric UK-based study.乳腺核心活检中诊断的伴有非典型上皮增生的放射状瘢痕/复杂硬化性病变的转归:一项基于英国的多中心研究结果。
J Clin Pathol. 2019 Dec;72(12):800-804. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2019-205764. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
7
Radial scars without atypia diagnosed at imaging-guided needle biopsy: how often is associated malignancy found at subsequent surgical excision, and do mammography and sonography predict which lesions are malignant?影像学引导下经皮穿刺活检诊断为无非典型性放射状瘢痕:在后续的外科切除中,有多少比例的病变与恶性肿瘤相关,且乳腺 X 线摄影和超声检查能否预测哪些病变为恶性?
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Apr;194(4):1146-51. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2326.
8
Isolated radial scar diagnosis by core-needle biopsy: Is surgical excision necessary?通过粗针活检诊断孤立性放射状瘢痕:是否需要手术切除?
Springerplus. 2016 Mar 31;5:398. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-1993-z. eCollection 2016.
9
Radial scar on image-guided breast biopsy: is surgical excision necessary?影像引导下乳腺活检中的放射状瘢痕:是否需要手术切除?
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jul;170(2):313-320. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4741-y. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
10
Management of radial scars/complex sclerosing lesions of the breast diagnosed on vacuum-assisted large-core biopsy: is surgery always necessary?在真空辅助大芯活检诊断的乳腺放射状瘢痕/复杂硬化性病变的处理:是否总是需要手术?
Histopathology. 2019 Dec;75(6):900-915. doi: 10.1111/his.13950. Epub 2019 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Radial sclerosing lesions found on core needle biopsy: excision can be safely avoided.在粗针活检中发现的放射性硬化性病变:可安全避免切除。
Histopathology. 2024 Sep;85(3):397-404. doi: 10.1111/his.15233. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
2
Upgrade risk of image-targeted radial scar and complex sclerosing lesions diagnosed at needle-guided biopsy: a retrospective study.在经皮引导活检诊断的影像目标性放射状瘢痕和复杂硬化性病变中升级的风险:一项回顾性研究。
Eur Radiol. 2023 Dec;33(12):8399-8406. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09877-6. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
3
Identification and diagnosis of mammographic malignant architectural distortion using a deep learning based mask regional convolutional neural network.使用基于深度学习的掩码区域卷积神经网络对乳腺钼靶恶性结构扭曲进行识别与诊断。
Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 22;13:1119743. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1119743. eCollection 2023.
4
Outcomes of high-risk breast lesions diagnosed using image-guided core needle biopsy: results from a multicenter retrospective study.采用影像引导下核心针活检诊断的高危乳腺病变的结果:一项多中心回顾性研究的结果。
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2023 Jul 20;29(4):579-587. doi: 10.4274/dir.2022.221790. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
5
Indeterminate (B3) Breast Lesions and the Ongoing Role of Diagnostic Open Biopsy.不确定(B3)型乳腺病变与诊断性开放活检的持续作用
Int J Breast Cancer. 2021 Dec 27;2021:5555458. doi: 10.1155/2021/5555458. eCollection 2021.
6
Radial Scar: a management dilemma.放射状瘢痕:一个管理难题。
Radiol Med. 2021 Jun;126(6):774-785. doi: 10.1007/s11547-021-01344-w. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
7
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Update on Technology, Evidence, and Clinical Practice.数字乳腺断层合成技术:技术、证据和临床实践的更新。
Radiographics. 2021 Mar-Apr;41(2):321-337. doi: 10.1148/rg.2021200101. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
8
Management of high-risk breast lesions diagnosed on core biopsies and experiences from prospective high-risk breast lesion conferences at an academic institution.在学术机构中对核心活检诊断的高危乳腺病变的管理,以及前瞻性高危乳腺病变会议的经验。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Feb;185(3):573-581. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05977-9. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
9
Radial scars/complex sclerosing lesions of the breast: radiologic and clinicopathologic correlation.乳腺放射状瘢痕/复杂性硬化性病变:影像学与临床病理对照研究
BMC Med Imaging. 2018 Nov 3;18(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12880-018-0279-z.
10
Lesions of "uncertain malignant potential" in the breast (B3) identified with mammography screening.乳腺 X 线筛查中发现的“性质不明的恶性潜能”病变(B3)。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Aug 16;18(1):829. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4742-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Multidisciplinary considerations in the management of high-risk breast lesions.高危乳腺病变的多学科处理。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Feb;198(2):W132-40. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7799.
2
Rationale of excisional biopsy after the diagnosis of benign radial scar on core biopsy: a single institutional outcome analysis.核心活检诊断为良性放射状瘢痕后行切除术活检的理由:单机构结果分析。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2013 Feb;36(1):7-11. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e3182354a3f.
3
Radial scar without associated atypical epithelial proliferation on image-guided 14-gauge needle core biopsy: analysis of 49 cases from a single-centre and review of the literature.影像学引导下 14 号针芯活检中无伴发非典型上皮增生的放射状瘢痕:单中心 49 例分析及文献复习。
Breast. 2012 Apr;21(2):159-64. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2011.09.005. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
4
Outcome of breast lesions diagnosed as lesion of uncertain malignant potential (B3) or suspicious of malignancy (B4) on needle core biopsy, including detailed review of epithelial atypia.经针芯活检诊断为不确定恶性潜能的乳腺病变(B3)或疑似恶性的乳腺病变(B4)的结果,包括上皮非典型性的详细评估。
Histopathology. 2011 Mar;58(4):626-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.03786.x. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
5
Characterization and outcome of breast needle core biopsy diagnoses of lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3) in abnormalities detected by mammographic screening.乳腺 X 线筛查异常中经乳腺针芯活检诊断为不确定恶性潜能病变(B3)的特征和转归。
Int J Cancer. 2011 Sep 15;129(6):1417-24. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25801. Epub 2011 Feb 11.
6
Conservative management of screen-detected radial scars: role of mammotome excision.乳腺微创旋切术在乳腺筛查中检出的乳腺放射状瘢痕的处理:保守治疗的作用。
J Clin Pathol. 2011 Jan;64(1):65-8. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2010.083485. Epub 2010 Nov 20.
7
The treatment of radial scars in the modern era--surgical excision is not required.现代治疗放射性瘢痕——无需手术切除。
Am Surg. 2010 May;76(5):522-5.
8
Radial scars without atypia diagnosed at imaging-guided needle biopsy: how often is associated malignancy found at subsequent surgical excision, and do mammography and sonography predict which lesions are malignant?影像学引导下经皮穿刺活检诊断为无非典型性放射状瘢痕:在后续的外科切除中,有多少比例的病变与恶性肿瘤相关,且乳腺 X 线摄影和超声检查能否预测哪些病变为恶性?
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Apr;194(4):1146-51. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2326.
9
Correlation of needle core biopsy with excision histology in screen-detected B3 lesions: the Merrion Breast Screening Unit experience.B3 型筛查性病变经针芯活检与切除组织学检查的相关性:Merrion 乳腺筛查单位的经验。
J Clin Pathol. 2009 Dec;62(12):1136-40. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2009.067280.
10
Update on percutaneous needle biopsy of nonmalignant breast lesions.非恶性乳腺病变的经皮穿刺活检最新进展
Adv Anat Pathol. 2009 Jul;16(4):183-95. doi: 10.1097/PAP.0b013e3181a9d33e.

影像引导下穿刺活检时的放射状瘢痕:是否需要切除?

Radial Scar at Image-guided Needle Biopsy: Is Excision Necessary?

作者信息

Conlon Niamh, D'Arcy Clare, Kaplan Jennifer B, Bowser Zenica L, Cordero Anibal, Brogi Edi, Corben Adriana D

机构信息

Departments of *Pathology †Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.

出版信息

Am J Surg Pathol. 2015 Jun;39(6):779-85. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000393.

DOI:10.1097/PAS.0000000000000393
PMID:25634748
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5012304/
Abstract

Optimal management of a lesion yielding radial scar (RS) without epithelial atypia on breast biopsy is controversial. In this single-institution study spanning 17 years, 53 patients with this biopsy diagnosis were evaluated in terms of clinical, radiologic, and pathologic features and outcomes. RSs were categorized as either "incidental" or as the "targeted" lesion according to defined criteria. Of 48 patients who underwent surgical excision after a diagnosis of RS on biopsy, only 1 had an "upgrade" diagnosis of malignancy (2%). No "incidental" RS was associated with the presence of malignancy on surgical excision. Meta-analysis of 20 RS excision studies demonstrated an overall upgrade rate of 10.4%, with a higher rate in patients with a diagnosis of RS with atypia (26%). The upgrade rate for RS without atypia was 7.5% overall. The lower rate of upgrade to malignancy in this study (2%) is likely related to the thorough radiologic-pathologic review undertaken. In the setting of multidisciplinary agreement and careful radiologic-pathologic correlation, it may be appropriate for patients with a biopsy diagnosis of RS without atypia to forego surgical excision in favor of imaging follow-up.

摘要

乳腺活检时出现无上皮异型性的放射状瘢痕(RS)的最佳处理方法存在争议。在这项为期17年的单机构研究中,对53例经活检诊断为此病的患者的临床、放射学、病理学特征及转归进行了评估。根据既定标准,RS被分为“偶然发现的”或“目标”病变。在48例活检诊断为RS后接受手术切除的患者中,只有1例被“升级”诊断为恶性肿瘤(2%)。手术切除时,没有“偶然发现的”RS与恶性肿瘤相关。对20项RS切除研究的荟萃分析显示,总体升级率为10.4%,诊断为有异型性的RS的患者升级率更高(26%)。无异型性的RS总体升级率为7.5%。本研究中较低的恶性肿瘤升级率(2%)可能与进行的全面放射学-病理学评估有关。在多学科达成共识且进行仔细的放射学-病理学关联分析的情况下,活检诊断为无异型性的RS的患者放弃手术切除而选择影像随访可能是合适的。