Center for Theoretical Problems of Physicochemical Pharmacology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Center for Theoretical Problems of Physicochemical Pharmacology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia ; National Research Center for Hematology, Moscow, Russia ; Physics Department, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia ; Federal Research and Clinical Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia ; Faculty of Biological and Medical Physics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russia ; HemaCore LLC, Moscow, Russia.
Thromb J. 2015 Jan 23;13(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12959-015-0038-0. eCollection 2015.
Thrombosis is a deadly malfunctioning of the hemostatic system occurring in numerous conditions and states, from surgery and pregnancy to cancer, sepsis and infarction. Despite availability of antithrombotic agents and vast clinical experience justifying their use, thrombosis is still responsible for a lion's share of mortality and morbidity in the modern world. One of the key reasons behind this is notorious insensitivity of traditional coagulation assays to hypercoagulation and their inability to evaluate thrombotic risks; specific molecular markers are more successful but suffer from numerous disadvantages. A possible solution is proposed by use of global, or integral, assays that aim to mimic and reflect the major physiological aspects of hemostasis process in vitro. Here we review the existing evidence regarding the ability of both established and novel global assays (thrombin generation, thrombelastography, thrombodynamics, flow perfusion chambers) to evaluate thrombotic risk in specific disorders. The biochemical nature of this risk and its detectability by analysis of blood state in principle are also discussed. We conclude that existing global assays have a potential to be an important tool of hypercoagulation diagnostics. However, their lack of standardization currently impedes their application: different assays and different modifications of each assay vary in their sensitivity and specificity for each specific pathology. In addition, it remains to be seen how their sensitivity to hypercoagulation (even when they can reliably detect groups with different risk of thrombosis) can be used for clinical decisions: the risk difference between such groups is statistically significant, but not large.
血栓形成是止血系统在多种情况下和状态下发生的致命故障,从手术和怀孕到癌症、败血症和梗塞。尽管有抗血栓药物和大量的临床经验证明其使用的合理性,但血栓形成仍然是现代世界中死亡率和发病率的主要原因之一。造成这种情况的一个关键原因是传统凝血检测对高凝状态的敏感性差,并且无法评估血栓形成的风险;特定的分子标志物更成功,但存在许多缺点。使用旨在模拟和反映止血过程主要生理方面的整体或综合检测方法提出了一种可能的解决方案。在这里,我们回顾了关于既定和新型整体检测方法(凝血酶生成、血栓弹力描记术、血栓动力学、流动灌注室)在特定疾病中评估血栓形成风险的能力的现有证据。还讨论了这种风险的生化性质及其通过分析血液状态在原则上的可检测性。我们得出的结论是,现有的整体检测方法有可能成为高凝诊断的重要工具。然而,它们缺乏标准化目前阻碍了它们的应用:不同的检测方法和每种检测方法的不同修改在针对每种特定病理的敏感性和特异性方面存在差异。此外,尚不清楚它们对高凝状态的敏感性(即使它们能够可靠地检测出具有不同血栓形成风险的组)如何用于临床决策:这些组之间的风险差异在统计学上是显著的,但不大。