LeBlanc Justin E M, MacDermid Joy C, Faber Kenneth J, Drosdowech Darren S, Athwal George S
Roth McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Center, St Joseph's Health Care, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Aug;29(8):379-83. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000294.
Hand dominance has been reported to be an important factor affecting outcomes after upper extremity trauma but remains unstudied after hemiarthroplasty for fracture. This study determined whether dominance affected outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures.
Retrospective cohort study.
Tertiary care referral center.
Sixty-one patients, after hemiarthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture, returned for comprehensive assessment and were divided into 2 groups: dominant (DOM) shoulder affected (n = 25) and non-dominant (non-DOM) shoulder affected (n = 36).
Fracture-specific proximal humeral hemiarthroplasty for displaced proximal humerus fractures.
Patients were assessed with self-reported outcomes (visual analog scale pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score, disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire, simple shoulder test, and short form 12) and objective (range-of-motion and hand-held dynamometer strength) testing.
At 49 months of mean follow-up, there were no significant differences between groups for gender, age, follow-up time, or visual analog scale pain (P > 0.256). The DOM-affected group had significantly worse scores for American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score (P = 0.043), disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (P = 0.039), and simple shoulder test (P = 0.021). The DOM-affected group also had consistently higher correlations between self-reported and objective outcomes than the non-DOM group.
Patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty for fracture on their DOM shoulders had significantly poorer outcomes than patients with non-DOM-sided injuries. Although positive outcomes can be expected after hemiarthroplasty, patients should be instructed that they may have less satisfactory function and strength if their injury was on the DOM side.
Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
据报道,手的优势是影响上肢创伤后预后的一个重要因素,但在肱骨骨折半关节置换术后尚未得到研究。本研究确定优势是否会影响肱骨近端骨折半关节置换术后的预后。
回顾性队列研究。
三级医疗转诊中心。
61例肱骨近端骨折行半关节置换术的患者返回进行综合评估,分为两组:优势(DOM)侧肩部受累组(n = 25)和非优势(非DOM)侧肩部受累组(n = 36)。
针对移位性肱骨近端骨折进行特定骨折的肱骨近端半关节置换术。
采用自我报告结局(视觉模拟评分疼痛、美国肩肘外科医师协会肩部评分、手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍问卷、简单肩部测试和简短健康调查问卷12)和客观指标(活动范围和手持测力计力量)对患者进行评估。
平均随访49个月时,两组在性别、年龄、随访时间或视觉模拟评分疼痛方面无显著差异(P > 0.256)。优势侧受累组在美国肩肘外科医师协会肩部评分(P = 0.043)、手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍问卷(P = 0.039)以及简单肩部测试(P = 0.021)方面的得分明显更差。优势侧受累组自我报告结局与客观指标之间的相关性也始终高于非优势侧组。
优势侧肩部骨折行半关节置换术的患者的预后明显比非优势侧受伤的患者差。虽然半关节置换术后可预期有良好的预后,但应告知患者,如果损伤发生在优势侧,其功能和力量可能不太理想。
预后II级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者指南。