• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

High-dose monotherapy and combination therapy with calcium channel blockers for angina. A comprehensive review of the literature.

作者信息

Temkin L P

机构信息

University of Arizona, Tucson.

出版信息

Am J Med. 1989 Jan 16;86(1A):23-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90006-5.

DOI:10.1016/0002-9343(89)90006-5
PMID:2563636
Abstract

Clinical experience with the calcium channel-blocking agents has established their efficacy in the therapy of painful and silent myocardial ischemia. Questions have arisen, however, about side-effect characteristics of these medications as clinical practice has led to utilization of higher doses of individual drugs than employed in large numbers of patients in early clinical trials as well as combinations with other antianginal agents including beta-blockers. A study was undertaken to examine the published literature regarding side effects associated with high-dose versus low-dose therapy with nifedipine and diltiazem and the use of these agents in combination with beta-blockers. This investigation demonstrated that utilization of high-dose diltiazem (more than 240 mg per day) as opposed to low-dose diltiazem (no more than 240 mg per day) was associated with an increased incidence of atrioventricular block, and increased peripheral vasodilatory effects. In contrast, the use of high-dose nifedipine (more than 60 mg per day) was not associated with atrioventricular block. At clinically high dosage levels, the incidence of peripheral edema was comparable for both nifedipine and diltiazem, although low-dose nifedipine resulted in a significantly greater incidence of edema compared with low-dose diltiazem. This analysis also demonstrated that bradyarrhythmia is associated with the combination of a beta-blocking agent and either low- or high-dose diltiazem, but not with nifedipine-beta-blocker combinations. Clinical experience suggests caution in the combined use of diltiazem and a beta-blocking agent because of the demonstrated additional adverse negative chronotropic and dromotropic effects. No additional adverse electrophysiologic effects have been noted for nifedipine-beta-blocker combinations. The literature analysis supports and mirrors widespread clinical experience obtained since nifedipine and diltiazem were introduced. It should be noted, though, that combination therapy with calcium channel blockers and beta-blockers should be done with caution, since there have been occasional reports of congestive heart failure or exacerbation of angina with this combination.

摘要

相似文献

1
High-dose monotherapy and combination therapy with calcium channel blockers for angina. A comprehensive review of the literature.
Am J Med. 1989 Jan 16;86(1A):23-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90006-5.
2
Calcium-channel blockers and beta blockers: advantages and disadvantages of combination therapy in chronic stable angina pectoris.钙通道阻滞剂与β受体阻滞剂:慢性稳定型心绞痛联合治疗的利弊
Am Heart J. 1982 Sep;104(3):702-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(82)90259-9.
3
Combination therapy with calcium-channel blockers and beta blockers for chronic stable angina pectoris.钙通道阻滞剂与β受体阻滞剂联合治疗慢性稳定性心绞痛。
Am J Cardiol. 1985 Jan 25;55(3):69B-80B. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(85)90615-0.
4
Combined use of calcium-channel and beta-adrenergic blockers for the treatment of chronic stable angina. Rationale, efficacy, and adverse effects.钙通道阻滞剂与β-肾上腺素能阻滞剂联合用于治疗慢性稳定性心绞痛。理论依据、疗效及不良反应。
Ann Intern Med. 1988 Oct 1;109(7):570-81. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-109-7-570.
5
Combination of calcium channel blockers and beta blockers for patients with exercise-induced angina pectoris: a double-blind parallel-group comparison of different classes of calcium channel blockers. The Netherlands Working Group on Cardiovascular Research (WCN).钙通道阻滞剂与β受体阻滞剂联合用于运动诱发性心绞痛患者:不同类别钙通道阻滞剂的双盲平行组比较。荷兰心血管研究工作组(WCN)。
Angiology. 1999 Jun;50(6):447-54. doi: 10.1177/000331979905000602.
6
Beta-blockers and calcium antagonists in angina pectoris. The potential role of combination therapy.β受体阻滞剂与钙拮抗剂在心绞痛治疗中的应用。联合治疗的潜在作用。
Drugs. 1988;35 Suppl 4:44-50. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198800354-00011.
7
Effects of nifedipine and diltiazem on myocardial ischemia in patients with severe stable angina pectoris treated with nitrates and beta-blockers.硝苯地平和地尔硫䓬对使用硝酸盐类和β受体阻滞剂治疗的重度稳定型心绞痛患者心肌缺血的影响。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1992 Dec;20(6):864-9. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199212000-00003.
8
Calcium channel antagonists. Part II: Use and comparative properties of the three prototypical calcium antagonists in ischemic heart disease, including recommendations based on an analysis of 41 trials.钙通道拮抗剂。第二部分:三种典型钙通道拮抗剂在缺血性心脏病中的应用及比较特性,包括基于41项试验分析的推荐意见。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1988 Jan;1(5):461-91. doi: 10.1007/BF02125731.
9
Comparative efficacy of nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system versus diltiazem when added to beta blockers in stable angina pectoris.硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统与地尔硫䓬在稳定型心绞痛中加用β受体阻滞剂时的疗效比较
Am J Cardiol. 1993 Apr 15;71(11):887-92. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90901-n.
10
Comparison of combination nifedipine-propranolol and diltiazem-propranolol with high dose diltiazem monotherapy for stable angina pectoris.
Am J Cardiol. 1988 Nov 15;62(16):1028-32. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(88)90542-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Peptide Sodium Channels Modulator Mu-Agatoxin-Aa1a Prevents Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury of Cells.肽钠通道调节剂 Mu-Agatoxin-Aa1a 可预防细胞缺血再灌注损伤。
Molecules. 2023 Apr 3;28(7):3174. doi: 10.3390/molecules28073174.
2
Amlodipine in patients with angina uncontrolled by atenolol. A double blind placebo controlled cross over trial.氨氯地平用于阿替洛尔治疗效果不佳的心绞痛患者。一项双盲安慰剂对照交叉试验。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1993;45(2):107-11. doi: 10.1007/BF00315489.