Assessing pharmacokinetic interactions between the sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor empagliflozin and hydrochlorothiazide or torasemide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, open-label, crossover study.

PURPOSE

Empagliflozin is a potent, selective sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Thiazide or loop diuretics are commonly prescribed in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. This study investigated potential pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions between empagliflozin and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) or torasemide (TOR).

METHODS

This was an open-label, crossover study. Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were randomized to receive empagliflozin 25 mg once daily for 5 days and either HCTZ 25 mg once daily for 4 days followed by HCTZ 25 mg once daily plus empagliflozin 25 mg once daily for 5 days or TOR 5 mg once daily for 4 days followed by TOR 5 mg once daily plus empagliflozin once daily for 5 days in 1 of 4 sequences, with at least a 7-day washout period between treatments. Pharmacokinetic parameters of empagliflozin, HCTZ, and TOR were assessed and standard bioequivalence criteria (80%-125%) were applied. Tolerability assessments included the frequency of adverse events and an investigator assessment of global tolerability.

FINDINGS

Mean (SD) age of the 22 patients treated was 54.0 (8.1) years and body mass index was 27.1 (3.7) kg/m(2). Coadministration of empagliflozin with HCTZ or TOR had no effect on exposure to empagliflozin, HCTZ, or TOR. Geometric mean ratios (90% CIs) for empagliflozin AUC over a uniform dosing interval and Cmax at steady state were 107.1% (90% CI, 97.1-118.1) and 102.8% (90% CI, 88.6-119.3), respectively, when coadministered with HCTZ versus administration alone, and 107.8% (90% CI, 100.1-116.1) and 107.5% (90% CI, 97.9-118.0), respectively, when coadministered with TOR versus administration alone. For HCTZ, the geometric mean ratios for AUC over a uniform dosing interval and Cmax at steady state were 96.3% (90% CI, 89.1-104.0) and 101.8% (90% CI, 88.6-116.9), respectively, and for TOR were 101.4% (90% CI, 99.1-103.9) and 104.4% (90% CI, 93.8-116.3), respectively, for combined treatment versus administration alone. The pharmacokinetic profiles of empagliflozin, HCTZ, and TOR were similar after administration alone and in combination. Global tolerability was good for all patients after each treatment, and no severe or serious adverse events were reported.

IMPLICATIONS

No pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction was observed between empagliflozin and HCTZ or TOR. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01276288.