Kawaguchi Gen, Sasamoto Ryuta, Abe Eisuke, Ohta Atsushi, Sato Hiraku, Tanaka Kensuke, Maruyama Katsuya, Kaizu Motoki, Ayukawa Fumio, Yamana Nobuko, Liu Junyang, Takeuchi Manabu, Kobayashi Masaaki, Aoyama Hidefumi
Departments of Radiation Oncology, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata, Japan.
Departments of Gastroenterology, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata, Japan.
Radiat Oncol. 2015 Jan 31;10:31. doi: 10.1186/s13014-015-0337-4.
To evaluate the risks and benefits of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in addition to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for the treatment of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC).
We retrospectively reviewed the treatment outcomes of 47 patients with SESCC treated between October 2000 and December 2011. Sixteen patients with invasion into the submucosal layer (T1b) or the muscularis mucosa (m3) with positive vascular invasion were treated with CRT after ESD (ESD-CRT group). The lymph node area was irradiated to a total dose of 40-44 Gy and a boost radiation was administered if PET-positive lymph nodes or positive margins were observed. The remaining 31 patients received definitive CRT only (dCRT group).
The radiation field was significantly larger in the ESD-CRT group; the "long T" was used in 11 patients (35.4%) in the dCRT group and 15 (93.7%) in the ESD-CRT group (p = 0.0001). The total radiation dose was smaller in the ESD-CRT group; 40 Gy was used in 10 patients (62.5%) in the ESD-CRT group and all but one patient in the dCRT group received ≥60 Gy (p = 0.00001). The 3-year overall survival rates in the dCRT and ESD-CRT groups were 63.2% and 90.0% respectively (p = 0.118). Recurrence developed in nine patients (29.0%) in the dCRT group and one (6.3%) in the ESD-CRT group. Local recurrence was observed in six patients (19%) in the dCRT group and none in the ESD-CRT-group (p = 0.029). Pericardial effusion (≥Grade 3) occurred in three patients (9.7%) in the dCRT group and none in the ESD-CRT group.
ESD followed by CRT is an effective and safe approach for SESCC at m3 or T1b. This combination of ESD and CRT improves the local control rate, and it could decrease the number of cardiac toxicities due to a radiation-dose reduction relative to CRT alone.
评估内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)联合放化疗(CRT)治疗浅表性食管鳞状细胞癌(SESCC)的风险与获益。
我们回顾性分析了2000年10月至2011年12月期间接受治疗的47例SESCC患者的治疗结果。16例侵犯黏膜下层(T1b)或黏膜肌层(m3)且伴有血管侵犯阳性的患者在ESD后接受CRT治疗(ESD-CRT组)。对淋巴结区域进行照射,总剂量为40-44 Gy,如果观察到PET阳性淋巴结或切缘阳性,则给予追加放疗。其余31例患者仅接受根治性CRT(dCRT组)。
ESD-CRT组的照射野明显更大;dCRT组11例患者(35.4%)采用“长T”照射,ESD-CRT组15例患者(93.7%)采用“长T”照射(p = 0.0001)。ESD-CRT组的总放疗剂量更小;ESD-CRT组10例患者(62.5%)采用40 Gy放疗,dCRT组除1例患者外其余所有患者接受的放疗剂量≥60 Gy(p = 0.00001)。dCRT组和ESD-CRT组的3年总生存率分别为63.2%和90.0%(p = 0.118)。dCRT组9例患者(29.0%)出现复发,ESD-CRT组1例患者(6.3%)出现复发。dCRT组6例患者(19%)出现局部复发,ESD-CRT组无局部复发(p = 0.029)。dCRT组3例患者(9. < span="">7%)出现心包积液(≥3级),ESD-CRT组无心包积液。
ESD后行CRT是治疗m3或T1b期SESCC的一种有效且安全的方法。ESD与CRT联合可提高局部控制率,并且相对于单纯CRT可因放疗剂量降低而减少心脏毒性的发生。