Suppr超能文献

无家可归青少年的风险评估与避孕套使用决策:一项多层次定性研究。

Risk evaluations and condom use decisions of homeless youth: a multi-level qualitative investigation.

作者信息

Kennedy David P, Brown Ryan A, Morrison Penelope, Vie Loryana, Ryan Gery W, Tucker Joan S

机构信息

RAND Health, RAND Corporation, P.O. Box 2138, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA, 90407, USA.

The RAND-University of Pittsburgh Health Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2015 Jan 31;15:62. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1419-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Homeless youth are at higher risk for sexually transmitted infections and unwanted pregnancy than non-homeless youth. However, little is known about how they evaluate risk within the context of their sexual relationships. It is important to understand homeless youths' condom use decisions in light of their sexual relationships because condom use decisions are influenced by relationship dynamics in addition to individual attitudes and event circumstances. It is also important to understand how relationship level factors, sexual event circumstances, and individual characteristics compare and intersect.

METHODS

To explore these issues, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 37 homeless youth in Los Angeles County in 2011 concerning their recent sexual relationships and analyzed the data using systematic methods of team-based qualitative data analysis.

RESULTS

We identified themes of risk-related evaluations and decisions at the relationship/partner, event, and individual level. We also identified three different risk profiles that emerged from analyzing how different levels of risk intersected across individual respondents. The three profiles included 1) Risk Takers, who consistently engage in risk and have low concern about consequences of risk behavior, 2) Risk Avoiders, who consistently show high concern about protection and consistently avoid risk, and 3) Risk Reactors, those who are inconsistent in their concerns about risk and protection and mainly take risks in reaction to relationship and event circumstances.

CONCLUSIONS

Interventions targeting homeless youth should reflect multiple levels of risk behavior and evaluation in order to address the diversity of risk profiles. Relationship/partner-, event-, and individual-level factors are all important but have different levels of importance for different homeless youth. Interventions should be tailored to address the most important factor contributing to homeless youth reproductive needs.

摘要

背景

与无家可归的青年相比,流浪青年感染性传播感染和意外怀孕的风险更高。然而,对于他们在性关系背景下如何评估风险却知之甚少。鉴于避孕套的使用决策除了受个人态度和事件情况影响外,还受关系动态的影响,了解流浪青年在其性关系背景下的避孕套使用决策非常重要。了解关系层面因素、性事件情况和个人特征如何相互比较和交叉也很重要。

方法

为了探讨这些问题,我们于2011年对洛杉矶县的37名流浪青年进行了关于他们近期性关系的半结构化访谈,并使用基于团队的定性数据分析系统方法对数据进行了分析。

结果

我们在关系/伴侣、事件和个人层面确定了与风险相关的评估和决策主题。我们还通过分析不同个体受访者不同风险水平如何交叉,确定了三种不同的风险概况。这三种概况包括:1)冒险者,他们持续从事有风险的行为,对风险行为的后果不太在意;2)风险规避者,他们始终高度关注保护措施,始终避免风险;3)风险反应者,他们对风险和保护的关注不一致,主要是在关系和事件情况下做出反应时冒险。

结论

针对流浪青年的干预措施应反映风险行为和评估的多个层面,以应对风险概况的多样性。关系/伴侣、事件和个人层面的因素都很重要,但对不同的流浪青年具有不同程度的重要性。干预措施应量身定制,以解决导致流浪青年生殖需求的最重要因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7914/4324882/f2537dd5c034/12889_2015_1419_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验