Roman Amanda, Rochelson Burton, Fox Nathan S, Hoffman Matthew, Berghella Vincenzo, Patel Vrunda, Calluzzo Ilia, Saccone Gabriele, Fleischer Adiel
Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine, Manhasset, NY.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun;212(6):788.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.031. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
We sought to compare the perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies with short cervical length (CL) with ultrasound-indicated cerclage (UIC) vs no cerclage (control).
This was a retrospective cohort study of asymptomatic twin pregnancies with transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) CL ≤25 mm at 16-24 weeks from 1995 through 2012 at 4 separate institutions. Exclusion criteria were: genetic or major fetal anomaly, multifetal reduction >14 weeks, monochorionic-monoamniotic placentation, or medically indicated preterm birth (PTB). Primary outcome was spontaneous PTB (SPTB) <34 weeks. Secondary outcome was SPTB <28, <32, and <37 weeks. We also planned to evaluate primary and secondary outcome for the subgroup of twin pregnancies with CL ≤15 mm.
In all, 140 women with twin pregnancy and TVU-CL ≤25 mm were managed with either UIC (n = 57) or no cerclage (n = 83). Demographic characteristics were not significantly different except women who underwent UIC presented at an earlier gestational age (GA) at diagnosis of short CL. After adjusting for GA at presentation, there were no differences in GA at delivery or SPTB <28 weeks: 12 (21.2%) vs 20 (24.1%) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-1.37), <32 weeks: 22 (38.6%) vs 36 (43.4%) aOR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.1-1.13), or <34 weeks: 29 (50.9%) vs 53 (63.9%) (aOR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.16-1.1). In the subgroup of women with CL ≤15 mm (32 with UIC and 39 controls) the interval between diagnosis to delivery was significantly prolonged by 12.5 ± 4.5 vs 8.8 ± 4.6 weeks (P < .001); SPTB <34 weeks was significantly decreased: 16 (50%) vs 31 (79.5%) (aOR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.31-0.83) as was admission to neonatal intensive care unit: 38/58 (65.5%) vs 63/76 (82.9%) (aOR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.24-0.81) when the UIC group was compared with the control group, respectively.
UIC in asymptomatic twin pregnancies with TVU-CL ≤25 mm was not associated with significant effects on perinatal outcomes compared to controls. However, in the planned subgroup analysis of asymptomatic twin pregnancies with TVU-CL ≤15 mm before 24 weeks, UIC was associated with a significant prolongation of pregnancy by almost 4 more weeks, significantly decreased SPTB <34 weeks by 49%, and admission to neonatal intensive care unit by 58% compared with controls.
我们试图比较超声引导下宫颈环扎术(UIC)与未行宫颈环扎术(对照组)对宫颈长度短(CL)的双胎妊娠围产期结局的影响。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为1995年至2012年期间在4个不同机构中孕16 - 24周经阴道超声(TVU)测量宫颈长度(CL)≤25 mm的无症状双胎妊娠。排除标准为:胎儿遗传或严重畸形、孕14周后减胎、单绒毛膜单羊膜囊胎盘或因医学原因导致的早产(PTB)。主要结局为孕34周前的自发性早产(SPTB)。次要结局为孕28、32和37周前的SPTB。我们还计划评估宫颈长度(CL)≤15 mm的双胎妊娠亚组的主要和次要结局。
共有140例宫颈长度(CL)≤25 mm的双胎妊娠妇女接受了超声引导下宫颈环扎术(UIC)(n = 57)或未行宫颈环扎术(对照组,n = 83)。除了接受超声引导下宫颈环扎术(UIC)的妇女在诊断宫颈长度短时孕周较小外,两组人口统计学特征无显著差异。在对就诊时孕周进行校正后,分娩时孕周或孕28周前的SPTB无差异:分别为12例(21.2%)和20例(24.1%)(校正比值比[aOR],0.3;95%置信区间[CI],0.68 - 1.37);孕32周前分别为22例(38.6%)和36例(43.4%)(aOR,0.34;95% CI,0.1 - 1.13);孕34周前分别为29例(50.9%)和53例(63.9%)(aOR,0.37;95% CI,0.16 - 1.1)。在宫颈长度(CL)≤15 mm的亚组妇女中(超声引导下宫颈环扎术组32例,对照组39例),诊断至分娩的间隔时间显著延长,分别为12.5±4.5周和8.8±4.6周(P < 0.001);孕34周前的SPTB显著降低:分别为16例(50%)和31例(79.5%)(aOR,0.51;95% CI,0.31 - 0.83),与对照组相比,超声引导下宫颈环扎术组新生儿重症监护病房入院率也显著降低:分别为38/58(65.5%)和63/76(82.9%)(aOR,0.42;95% CI,0.24 - 0.81)。
与对照组相比,超声引导下宫颈环扎术(UIC)对宫颈长度(TVU - CL)≤25 mm的无症状双胎妊娠围产期结局无显著影响。然而,在对孕24周前宫颈长度(TVU - CL)≤15 mm的无症状双胎妊娠进行的计划亚组分析中,与对照组相比,超声引导下宫颈环扎术(UIC)可使孕周显著延长近4周,孕34周前的SPTB显著降低49%,新生儿重症监护病房入院率降低58%。