Rooney Kathleen A, Denny Ashleigh E, Hou Melody Y, Creinin Mitchell D
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Contraception. 2015 May;91(5):403-5. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.01.015. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
Compare long-acting contraceptive (LARC) utilization 1 month following a medical abortion among women who chose office or telephone follow-up.
We performed a chart review of 79 patients in a new medical abortion service. Women chose a 1-week follow-up in-office or by phone. Contraceptive implants could be placed 1 week and intrauterine contraceptives 4 weeks after mifepristone administration.
LARC methods were desired by 38% and 44% of women, and received by 27% and 29% of women in the office and phone follow-up groups, respectively (p=.8).
The choice of follow-up in-office or by phone did not change the LARC uptake rate.
Women should not be discouraged to follow up by phone due to concern for decreased LARC uptake.
比较选择门诊或电话随访的女性药物流产后1个月长效避孕方法（LARC）的使用情况。
我们对一家新的药物流产服务机构的79例患者进行了病历回顾。女性选择在门诊或通过电话进行为期1周的随访。在服用米非司酮1周后可放置避孕植入剂，4周后可放置宫内节育器。
门诊随访组和电话随访组分别有38%和44%的女性希望采用LARC方法，两组中分别有27%和29%的女性接受了LARC方法（p = 0.8）。
选择门诊随访或电话随访并不会改变LARC的使用率。
不应因担心LARC使用率降低而劝阻女性通过电话进行随访。
