基于某学术中心药物流产随访类型的大孔径放射治疗（LARC）的应用情况
LARC utilization based on type of medical abortion follow-up at an academic center.
作者信息
Rooney Kathleen A, Denny Ashleigh E, Hou Melody Y, Creinin Mitchell D
机构信息
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
出版信息
Contraception. 2015 May;91(5):403-5. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.01.015. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
OBJECTIVE
Compare long-acting contraceptive (LARC) utilization 1 month following a medical abortion among women who chose office or telephone follow-up.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We performed a chart review of 79 patients in a new medical abortion service. Women chose a 1-week follow-up in-office or by phone. Contraceptive implants could be placed 1 week and intrauterine contraceptives 4 weeks after mifepristone administration.
RESULTS
LARC methods were desired by 38% and 44% of women, and received by 27% and 29% of women in the office and phone follow-up groups, respectively (p=.8).
CONCLUSION
The choice of follow-up in-office or by phone did not change the LARC uptake rate.
IMPLICATIONS
Women should not be discouraged to follow up by phone due to concern for decreased LARC uptake.
目的
比较选择门诊或电话随访的女性药物流产后1个月长效避孕方法（LARC）的使用情况。
材料与方法
我们对一家新的药物流产服务机构的79例患者进行了病历回顾。女性选择在门诊或通过电话进行为期1周的随访。在服用米非司酮1周后可放置避孕植入剂，4周后可放置宫内节育器。
结果
门诊随访组和电话随访组分别有38%和44%的女性希望采用LARC方法，两组中分别有27%和29%的女性接受了LARC方法（p = 0.8）。
结论
选择门诊随访或电话随访并不会改变LARC的使用率。
启示
不应因担心LARC使用率降低而劝阻女性通过电话进行随访。
Zotero 插件