Krabbenborg Manon A M, Boersma Sandra N, Beijersbergen Mariëlle D, Goscha Richard J, Wolf Judith R L M
Ms. Krabbenborg, Dr. Boersma, Dr. Beijersbergen, and Dr. Wolf are with the Department of Primary and Community Care, Impuls-Netherlands Centre for Social Care Research, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (e-mail:
Psychiatr Serv. 2015 May 1;66(5):470-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300425. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
In a cluster randomized controlled trial, this study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of and fidelity to Houvast (Dutch for "grip"), a strengths-based intervention to improve the quality of life for homeless young adults.
Fidelity was measured six months after professionals and team leaders at five Dutch shelters for homeless young adults finished their training in Houvast. Fidelity was measured with the Dutch version of the strengths model fidelity scale, which consists of ten indicators distributed across three subscales: structure, supervision, and clinical practice. A total fidelity score was composed by averaging the ten indicator scores for each facility. During one-day audits by two trained assessors visiting each facility, a file analysis (N=46), a focus group with homeless young adults (N=19), and interviews with the team leader and supervisor (N=9) were conducted. Professionals, supervisors, and team leaders completed questionnaires two weeks before the audit (N=43). In addition, an evaluation of the audit was conducted six months later.
Although none of the five shelters achieved a sufficient total model fidelity score, median scores on caseload, group supervision, and strengths assessment were satisfactory. Each facility received a report with a set of recommendations to improve model fidelity. The evaluation showed improvements in use of the strengths assessment and personal recovery plans and in supervision.
Facilities face several challenges when implementing a new intervention, and implementing Houvast was no exception. Learning experiences and possible explanations for the insufficient total fidelity scores are reported.
在一项整群随机对照试验中,本研究旨在调查Houvast(荷兰语,意为“掌控”)这一基于优势的干预措施对改善无家可归青年成年人生活质量的有效性及保真度。
在荷兰五家为无家可归青年成年人提供庇护的机构中,专业人员和团队领导完成Houvast培训六个月后,对保真度进行测量。使用荷兰版的优势模型保真度量表进行测量,该量表由分布在三个子量表中的十个指标组成:结构、监督和临床实践。通过对每个机构的十个指标得分求平均值得出总保真度得分。在两名经过培训的评估人员对每个机构进行为期一天的审核期间,进行了文件分析(N = 46)、与无家可归青年成年人的焦点小组讨论(N = 19)以及与团队领导和主管的访谈(N = 9)。专业人员、主管和团队领导在审核前两周完成了问卷(N = 43)。此外,在六个月后对审核进行了评估。
虽然五家庇护所中没有一家获得足够的总模型保真度得分,但在病例量、小组监督和优势评估方面的中位数得分令人满意。每个机构都收到了一份包含一系列提高模型保真度建议的报告。评估显示在优势评估和个人康复计划的使用以及监督方面有所改进。
在实施新的干预措施时,各机构面临若干挑战,实施Houvast也不例外。报告了总保真度得分不足的学习经验及可能原因。