Suppr超能文献

经直肠超声引导下前列腺活检中利多卡因喷雾给药:五年经验

Lidocaine spray administration in transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: five years of experience.

作者信息

Dell'Atti Lucio

机构信息

Department of Urology, University Hospital "S. Anna", Ferrara.

出版信息

Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2014 Dec 30;86(4):340-3. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2014.4.340.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We report in this singlecenter study our results of a five-year experience in the administration of lidocaine spray (LS) during ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TPB).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between August 2008 and July 2013 a total of 1022 consecutive male patients scheduled for TPB with elevate PSA (≥ 4 ng/ml) and (or) abnormal digital rectal and (or) suspect TRUS were considered eligible for the study. Each patient was treated under local anaesthesia with LS (10 gr/100 ml), applied two minutes before the procedure. TPB was performed with the patient in the left lateral decubitus using multi-frequency convex probe "end-fire". Two experienced urologists performed a 14-core biopsy, as first intention. After the procedure each patient was given a verbal numeric pain scale (VNS). The evaluation was differentiated in two scales VNS: VNS 1 for the insertion of the probe and the manoeuvres associated, while VNS 2 only for the pain during needle's insertion.

RESULTS

Pain scores were not statistically significant different with regard to the values of PSA and prostate gland volume. Pain score levels during probe insertion and biopsy were significantly different: the mean pain score according to VNS was 3.3 (2-8) in the first questionnaire (VNS1) (p < 0.001) and 2.1 (1-7) in the second one (VNS2) (p < 0.125). The 8.2% of cases referred severe or unbearable pain (score ≥ 7), 74% of patients referred no pain at all. Only 21 patients would not ever repeat the biopsy or would request a different type of anaesthesia, while 82% of them would repeat it in the same way. In only eight patients we have not been able to insert TRUS probe.

CONCLUSIONS

Our pain score data suggest that LS provides efficient patient comfort during TPB reducing pain both during insertion of the probe and the needle. This non-infiltrative anaesthesia is safe, easy to administer, psychologically well accepted by patients and of low cost.

摘要

目的

在这项单中心研究中,我们报告了在超声引导下经直肠前列腺穿刺活检(TPB)过程中使用利多卡因喷雾(LS)的五年经验结果。

材料与方法

2008年8月至2013年7月期间,共有1022例连续的男性患者计划进行TPB,这些患者的前列腺特异抗原(PSA)升高(≥4 ng/ml)和(或)直肠指检异常和(或)经直肠超声检查(TRUS)可疑,被认为符合研究条件。每位患者在局部麻醉下使用LS(10克/100毫升),在操作前两分钟应用。TPB在患者左侧卧位时使用多频率凸阵探头“端射”进行。两名经验丰富的泌尿科医生进行了14针穿刺活检,作为首选方法。操作后,每位患者接受了口头数字疼痛量表(VNS)评估。评估分为两个VNS量表:VNS 1用于探头插入及相关操作,而VNS 2仅用于穿刺针插入时的疼痛。

结果

疼痛评分在PSA值和前列腺体积方面无统计学显著差异。探头插入和活检期间的疼痛评分水平有显著差异:根据VNS,第一个问卷(VNS1)中的平均疼痛评分为3.3(2 - 8)(p < 0.001),第二个问卷(VNS2)中的平均疼痛评分为2.1(1 - 7)(p < 0.125)。8.2%的病例报告有严重或难以忍受的疼痛(评分≥7),74%的患者报告完全没有疼痛。只有21例患者表示不会再次进行活检或会要求采用不同类型的麻醉,而其中82%的患者会以相同方式再次进行活检。仅8例患者未能插入TRUS探头。

结论

我们的疼痛评分数据表明,LS在TPB过程中能有效减轻患者痛苦,在探头插入和穿刺针插入时均能减轻疼痛。这种非浸润性麻醉安全、易于实施、患者心理上易于接受且成本低廉。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验