Strickland Tracy, Watkins Marley W, Caterino Linda C
Department of Educational Psychology, Arizona State University.
Department of Educational Psychology.
Psychol Assess. 2015 Jun;27(2):689-97. doi: 10.1037/pas0000052. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
The structure of the Woodcock-Johnson Cognitive Battery-Third Edition (WJ Cog) has been extensively explored via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with its normative sample, but there has been little research to verify that the same structure holds for students referred for special education services. Likewise, research on the structure of the WJ Cog with exploratory factor analysis (EFA) methods has been rare. Consequently, this study applied both EFA and CFA methods to the scores of 529 elementary school students referred for special education services (95.5% eligible) on the 14 tests of the WJ Cog extended battery. EFA results suggested only 2 or 3 factors, whereas CFA results favored the theoretical 7 factors posited by McGrew and Woodcock. In this theoretical model, a strong general factor accounted for 27% of the total variance and 57% of the common variance, whereas the 7 group factors combined accounted for 21% of the total variance and 43% of the common variance. Reliability, as quantified by ωH, was good for the general factor, marginal for the Gs factor, and poor for the other group factors. Nine of the 14 WJ Cog tests displayed uniqueness values that exceeded their communality. On the basis of this evidence from a referral sample, interpretation of the WJ Cog should be restricted to the Gs and g factors: the Gs factor because it exhibited considerable independence and precision of measurement and the g factor because it has emerged in all investigations of the WJ Cog.
伍德科克-约翰逊认知能力测验第三版(WJ Cog)的结构已通过对其常模样本进行验证性因素分析(CFA)得到了广泛探究,但几乎没有研究来验证对于被转介接受特殊教育服务的学生而言,同样的结构是否成立。同样,运用探索性因素分析(EFA)方法对WJ Cog结构进行的研究也很少见。因此,本研究将EFA和CFA方法应用于529名被转介接受特殊教育服务的小学生(符合条件的占95.5%)在WJ Cog扩展版14项测验上的得分。EFA结果表明只有2个或3个因素,而CFA结果支持McGrew和Woodcock提出的理论上的7个因素。在这个理论模型中,一个强大的一般因素占总方差的27%和共同方差的57%,而7个组因素合起来占总方差的21%和共同方差的43%。以ωH量化的信度,对于一般因素来说良好,对于Gs因素来说处于临界状态,而对于其他组因素来说较差。WJ Cog的14项测验中有9项显示出独特性值超过了它们的共同性。基于来自转介样本的这一证据,对WJ Cog的解释应限于Gs和g因素:Gs因素是因为它表现出了相当大的测量独立性和精确性,g因素是因为它在对WJ Cog的所有研究中都出现了。