• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

WJ III认知能力测验的增量效度:超出GIA-E的有限预测效应。

Incremental validity of the WJ III COG: Limited predictive effects beyond the GIA-E.

作者信息

McGill Ryan J, Busse R T

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Philosophy, Texas Woman's University.

College of Educational Studies, Chapman University.

出版信息

Sch Psychol Q. 2015 Sep;30(3):353-365. doi: 10.1037/spq0000094. Epub 2014 Oct 13.

DOI:10.1037/spq0000094
PMID:25313719
Abstract

This study is an examination of the incremental validity of Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) broad clusters from the Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Cognitive Abilities (WJ III COG) for predicting scores on the Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement (WJ III ACH). The participants were children and adolescents, ages 6-18 (n = 4,722), drawn from the WJ III standardization sample. The sample was nationally stratified and proportional to U.S. census estimates for race/ethnicity, parent education level, and geographic region. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses were used to assess for cluster-level effects after controlling for the variance accounted for by the General Intellectual Ability-Extended (GIA-E) composite score. The results were interpreted using the R²/ΔR² statistic as the effect size indicator. Consistent with previous studies, the GIA-E accounted for statistically and clinically significant portions of WJ III ACH cluster score variance, with R2 values ranging from .29 to .56. WJ III COG CHC cluster scores collectively provided statistically significant incremental variance beyond the GIA-E in all of the regression models, although the effect sizes were consistently negligible to small (Average ΔR2(CHC) = .06), with significant effects observed only in the Oral Expression model (ΔR²(CHC) = .23). Individually, the WJ III COG cluster scores accounted for mostly small portions of achievement variance across the prediction models, with a large effect found for the Comprehension-Knowledge cluster in the Oral Expression model (ΔR²(Gc) = .23). The potential clinical and theoretical implications of these results are discussed.

摘要

本研究旨在检验伍德科克-约翰逊认知能力测验第三版(WJ III COG)中卡特尔-霍恩-卡罗尔(CHC)宽泛集群对于预测伍德科克-约翰逊学业成就测验第三版(WJ III ACH)分数的增量效度。参与者为6至18岁的儿童和青少年(n = 4722),取自WJ III标准化样本。该样本按全国范围分层,且在种族/族裔、父母教育水平和地理区域方面与美国人口普查估计数成比例。在控制了一般智力能力扩展版(GIA-E)综合分数所解释的方差后,采用分层多元回归分析来评估集群水平的效应。结果使用R²/ΔR²统计量作为效应大小指标进行解释。与先前研究一致,GIA-E在统计学和临床上均解释了WJ III ACH集群分数方差的显著部分,R²值范围为0.29至0.56。在所有回归模型中,WJ III COG CHC集群分数共同提供了超出GIA-E的统计学显著增量方差,尽管效应大小始终微不足道至较小(平均ΔR2(CHC) = 0.06),仅在口语表达模型中观察到显著效应(ΔR²(CHC) = 0.23)。单独来看,WJ III COG集群分数在各个预测模型中大多解释了成就方差的一小部分,在口语表达模型中理解-知识集群发现了较大效应(ΔR²(Gc) = 0.23)。讨论了这些结果潜在的临床和理论意义。

相似文献

1
Incremental validity of the WJ III COG: Limited predictive effects beyond the GIA-E.WJ III认知能力测验的增量效度:超出GIA-E的有限预测效应。
Sch Psychol Q. 2015 Sep;30(3):353-365. doi: 10.1037/spq0000094. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
2
Interpretation of KABC-II scores: An evaluation of the incremental validity of Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) factor scores in predicting achievement.考夫曼儿童评估成套测验第二版(KABC-II)分数解读:对卡特尔-霍恩-卡罗尔(CHC)因素分数在预测学业成就方面的增量效度评估。
Psychol Assess. 2015 Dec;27(4):1417-26. doi: 10.1037/pas0000127. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
3
Woodcock-Johnson-III, Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test (KAIT), Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (KABC), and Differential Ability Scales (DAS) support Carroll but not Cattell-Horn.伍德科克-约翰逊第三版、考夫曼青少年与成人智力量表(KAIT)、考夫曼儿童成套评估测验(KABC)以及差异能力量表(DAS)支持卡罗尔的理论,但不支持卡特尔-霍恩的理论。
Psychol Assess. 2017 Aug;29(8):1001-1015. doi: 10.1037/pas0000389. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
4
Exploratory and higher order factor analysis of the WJ-III full test battery: a school-aged analysis.韦氏智力量表第三版成套测验的探索性和高阶因子分析:学龄期分析。
Psychol Assess. 2013 Jun;25(2):442-55. doi: 10.1037/a0031335. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
5
Structure of the Woodcock-Johnson III cognitive tests in a referral sample of elementary school students.小学生转介样本中伍德科克-约翰逊第三版认知测试的结构
Psychol Assess. 2015 Jun;27(2):689-97. doi: 10.1037/pas0000052. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
6
Invariance of Woodcock-Johnson III scores for students with learning disorders and students without learning disorders.学习障碍学生与非学习障碍学生的伍德科克-约翰逊第三版测验分数的不变性。
Sch Psychol Q. 2013 Sep;28(3):256-272. doi: 10.1037/spq0000028. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
7
Examination of differential effects of cognitive abilities on reading and mathematics achievement across race and ethnicity: Evidence with the WJ IV.考察认知能力对不同种族和族裔的阅读和数学成绩的差异影响:基于 WJ IV 的证据。
J Sch Psychol. 2022 Aug;93:1-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2022.05.001. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
8
Exploratory and hierarchical factor analysis of the WJ-IV Cognitive at school age.学龄期WJ-IV认知能力的探索性和分层因素分析。
Psychol Assess. 2017 Apr;29(4):394-407. doi: 10.1037/pas0000350. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
9
Hierarchical exploratory factor analyses of the Woodcock-Johnson IV Full Test Battery: Implications for CHC application in school psychology.伍德科克-约翰逊四版全量表测验的分层探索性因素分析:对学校心理学中CHC理论应用的启示
Sch Psychol Q. 2018 Jun;33(2):235-250. doi: 10.1037/spq0000221. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
10
Meta-analysis of the relationship between academic achievement and broad abilities of the Cattell-horn-Carroll theory.卡特尔-霍恩-卡罗尔理论的学业成就与广泛能力关系的元分析。
J Sch Psychol. 2018 Dec;71:42-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2018.10.001. Epub 2018 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of multidimensional models of WAIS-IV subtest performance.韦氏成人智力量表第四版分测验成绩的多维模型评估。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2017 Aug-Oct;31(6-7):1127-1140. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2017.1320426. Epub 2017 Apr 21.