Kuerbis Alexis N, Yuan Stanley E, Borok Jenna, LeFevre Peter M, Kim Gloria S, Lum Daryl, Ramirez Karina D, Liao Diana H, Moore Alison A
Silberman School of Social Work, Hunter College, New York, New York.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Feb;63(2):321-6. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13237. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
To determine the initial efficacy of a mailed screening and brief intervention to reduce at-risk drinking in persons aged 50 and older.
Pilot randomized controlled trial.
University of California at Los Angeles Department of Medicine Community Offices and Primary Care Network.
Individuals aged 50 and older who were identified as at-risk drinkers according to the Comorbidity Alcohol Risk Evaluation Tool (CARET) (N = 86).
Participants were assigned randomly to receive personalized mailed feedback outlining their specific risks associated with alcohol use, an educational booklet on alcohol and aging, and the National Institutes of Health Rethinking Drinking: Alcohol and Your Health booklet (intervention group) or nothing (control group).
Alcohol-related assessments at baseline and 3 months; CARET-assessed at-risk drinking, number of risks, and types of risks.
At 3 months, fewer intervention group participants than controls were at-risk drinkers (66% vs 88%), binge drinking (45% vs 68%), using alcohol with a medical or psychiatric condition (3% vs 17%), or having symptoms of such a condition (29% vs 49%).
A brief mailed intervention may be an effective approach to intervening with at-risk drinkers aged 50 and older.
确定邮寄筛查和简短干预措施对降低50岁及以上人群危险饮酒行为的初步疗效。
试点随机对照试验。
加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校医学系社区办公室和初级保健网络。
根据共病酒精风险评估工具(CARET)被确定为危险饮酒者的50岁及以上个体(N = 86)。
参与者被随机分配接受个性化邮寄反馈,其中概述了他们与饮酒相关的具体风险、一本关于酒精与衰老的教育手册以及美国国立卫生研究院的《重新思考饮酒:酒精与你的健康》手册(干预组),或不接受任何干预(对照组)。
基线和3个月时的酒精相关评估;CARET评估的危险饮酒情况、风险数量和风险类型。
在3个月时,干预组中处于危险饮酒状态的参与者少于对照组(66%对88%),暴饮者比例(45%对68%)、在患有医学或精神疾病时饮酒的比例(3%对17%),或出现此类疾病症状的比例(29%对49%)。
简短的邮寄干预可能是干预50岁及以上危险饮酒者的有效方法。