Miedl Stephan F, Wiswede Daniel, Marco-Pallarés Josep, Ye Zheng, Fehr Thorsten, Herrmann Manfred, Münte Thomas F
Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Department of Neurology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
Brain Imaging Behav. 2015 Dec;9(4):887-98. doi: 10.1007/s11682-015-9352-1.
Pathological gambling is thought to result from a shift of balance between two competing neurobiological mechanisms: on the one hand the reward system involved in the regulation of the urge to get rewards and on the other hand the top-down control system. Fifteen pathological gamblers (PG) and fifteen healthy controls (HC) were studied in an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment where participants had to choose either a smaller, but immediately available monetary reward (SIR) or a larger delayed reward (LDR). We examined contrasts between LDR and SIR decisions. Additionally, we contrasted choices near the individual indifference point (indifferent decisions) and clear SIR or LDR choices (sure decisions). Behavioral data confirmed former results of steeper discount rates in PG. Contrasting choices of LDR vs. SIR showed widespread bilateral activations in PG, including postcentral gyrus, thalamus, superior/medial frontal gyrus and cingulate gyrus, whereas HC demonstrated only focal left-sided pre/postcentral activity. Forgoing an immediate reward thus recruits a widespread brain network including typical control areas. Indifferent vs. sure decisions were associated with widespread activation in PG, including the bilateral fronto-parietal cortex, insula, anterior cingulate gyrus, and striatum, whereas in HC, only bilateral frontal cortex and insula were activated. The reverse contrast demonstrated more activity for sure decisions in the cingulate gyrus, insula, and medial frontal gyrus in HC, whereas PG showed inferior parietal and superior temporal activity. The present study demonstrates that pathological gambling is associated with a shift in the interplay between a prefrontal-parietal control network and a brain network involved in immediate reward consumption.
一方面是参与调节获取奖励冲动的奖励系统,另一方面是自上而下的控制系统。在一项事件相关功能磁共振成像实验中,对15名病理性赌博者(PG)和15名健康对照者(HC)进行了研究,参与者必须在较小但即时可得的金钱奖励(SIR)或较大的延迟奖励(LDR)之间做出选择。我们研究了LDR和SIR决策之间的对比。此外,我们对比了接近个体无差异点的选择(无差异决策)和明确的SIR或LDR选择(确定决策)。行为数据证实了之前关于PG中贴现率更陡峭的结果。对比LDR与SIR的选择发现,PG中存在广泛的双侧激活,包括中央后回、丘脑、额上/中回和扣带回,而HC仅表现出左侧中央前/后回的局部活动。因此,放弃即时奖励会激活一个包括典型控制区域的广泛脑网络。无差异决策与确定决策在PG中与广泛激活相关,包括双侧额顶叶皮层、岛叶、前扣带回和纹状体,而在HC中,仅双侧额叶皮层和岛叶被激活。反向对比显示,HC中扣带回、岛叶和额内侧回在确定决策时活动更多,而PG表现出顶下叶和颞上叶的活动。本研究表明,病理性赌博与前额叶-顶叶控制网络和参与即时奖励消费的脑网络之间相互作用的转变有关。