Zhao Bo, Yang Yong, Li Xiang, Li Tianfang, Heron Dwight E, Saiful Huq M
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA.
Med Dosim. 2015 Spring;40(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2014.01.002.
In linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and radiotherapy (SRT), circular cone(s) or conformal arc(s) are conventionally used to treat intracranial lesions. However, when the target is in close proximity to critical structures, it is frequently quite challenging to generate a quality plan using these techniques. In this study, we investigated the dosimetric characteristics of using high-dose rate RapidArc (RA) technique for radiosurgical treatment of intracranial lesions. A total of 10 intracranial SRS/SRT cases previously planned using dynamic conformal arc (DCA) or cone-based techniques have been included in this study. For each case, 3 treatment plans were generated: (1) a DCA plan with multiple noncoplanar arcs, (2) a high-dose rate RA plan with arcs oriented the same as DCA (multiple-arc RA), and 3) a high-dose rate RA plan with a single coplanar arc (single-arc RA). All treatment plans were generated under the same prescription and similar critical structure dose limits. Plan quality for different plans was evaluated by comparing various dosimetric parameters such as target coverage, conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), critical structures, and normal brain tissue doses as well as beam delivery time. With similar critical structure sparing, high-dose rate RA plans can achieve much better target coverage, dose conformity, and dose homogeneity than the DCA plans can. Plan quality indices CI and HI, for the DCA, multiple-arc RA, and single-arc RA techniques, were measured as 1.67 ± 0.39, 1.32 ± 0.28, and 1.38 ± 0.30 and 1.24 ± 0.11, 1.10 ± 0.04, and 1.12 ± 0.07, respectively. Normal brain tissue dose (V12Gy) was found to be similar for DCA and multiple-arc RA plans but much larger for the single-arc RA plans. Beam delivery was similar for DCA and multiple-arc RA plans but shorter with single-arc RA plans. Multiple-arc RA SRS/SRT can provide better treatment plans than conventional DCA plans, especially for complex cases.
在基于直线加速器的立体定向放射外科治疗(SRS)和立体定向放射治疗(SRT)中,传统上使用圆锥束或适形弧来治疗颅内病变。然而,当靶区紧邻关键结构时,使用这些技术生成高质量计划通常颇具挑战性。在本研究中,我们调查了使用高剂量率容积弧形调强放疗(RA)技术进行颅内病变放射外科治疗的剂量学特征。本研究共纳入了10例先前使用动态适形弧(DCA)或基于圆锥束技术进行计划的颅内SRS/SRT病例。对于每个病例,生成了3个治疗计划:(1)一个具有多个非共面弧的DCA计划,(2)一个弧的方向与DCA相同的高剂量率RA计划(多弧RA),以及(3)一个具有单个共面弧的高剂量率RA计划(单弧RA)。所有治疗计划均在相同的处方和相似的关键结构剂量限制下生成。通过比较各种剂量学参数,如靶区覆盖度、适形指数(CI)、均匀性指数(HI)、关键结构和正常脑组织剂量以及射束投照时间,来评估不同计划的计划质量。在对关键结构的保护相似的情况下,高剂量率RA计划比DCA计划能实现更好的靶区覆盖、剂量适形性和剂量均匀性。DCA、多弧RA和单弧RA技术的计划质量指标CI和HI分别测量为1.67±0.39、1.32±0.28和1.38±0.30以及1.24±0.11、1.10±0.04和1.12±0.07。发现DCA计划和多弧RA计划的正常脑组织剂量(V12Gy)相似,但单弧RA计划的要大得多。DCA计划和多弧RA计划的射束投照相似,但单弧RA计划的更短。多弧RA SRS/SRT可以提供比传统DCA计划更好的治疗计划,尤其是对于复杂病例。