Peacock Corey A, Krein Darren D, Antonio Jose, Sanders Gabriel J, Silver Tobin A, Colas Megan
1Exercise and Sports Science, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida; 2Miami Dolphins, Strength and Conditioning, Davie, Florida; and 3Kinesiology, Northern Kentucky University, Highland Heights, Kentucky.
J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Aug;29(8):2310-5. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000867.
Many strength and conditioning professionals have included the use of foam rolling devices within a warm-up routine prior to both training and competition. Multiple studies have investigated foam rolling in regards to performance, flexibility, and rehabilitation; however, additional research is necessary in supporting the topic. Furthermore, as multiple foam rolling progressions exist, researching differences that may result from each is required. To investigate differences in foam rolling progressions, 16 athletically trained males underwent a 2-condition within-subjects protocol comparing the differences of 2 common foam rolling progressions in regards to performance testing. The 2 conditions included a foam rolling progression targeting the mediolateral axis of the body (FRml) and foam rolling progression targeting the anteroposterior axis (FRap). Each was administered in adjunct with a full-body dynamic warm-up. After each rolling progression, subjects performed National Football League combine drills, flexibility, and subjective scaling measures. The data demonstrated that FRml was effective at improving flexibility (p ≤ 0.05) when compared with FRap. No other differences existed between progressions.
许多体能训练专业人员在训练和比赛前的热身环节中都采用了泡沫轴放松设备。多项研究对泡沫轴放松在体能表现、柔韧性和康复方面进行了调查;然而,还需要更多研究来支持这一主题。此外,由于存在多种泡沫轴放松进阶方式,有必要研究每种方式可能产生的差异。为了探究泡沫轴放松进阶方式的差异,16名经过体育训练的男性参与了一项双条件受试者内实验方案,比较了两种常见泡沫轴放松进阶方式在体能测试方面的差异。这两种条件包括针对身体内外侧轴的泡沫轴放松进阶方式(FRml)和针对前后轴的泡沫轴放松进阶方式(FRap)。每种方式都与全身动态热身一起进行。在每次放松进阶后,受试者进行美国国家橄榄球联盟综合测试、柔韧性测试和主观评分测量。数据表明,与FRap相比,FRml在提高柔韧性方面有效(p≤0.05)。两种进阶方式之间不存在其他差异。