Suppr超能文献

个体与实践层面的医疗之家措施比较。

A comparison of individual- versus practice-level measures of the medical home.

机构信息

Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Massachusetts Medical School/UMass Memorial Children's Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts; and

Department of Pediatrics, Boston University School of Medicine/Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2015 Mar;135(3):489-94. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-2892. Epub 2015 Feb 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association between a widely used individual-level assessment of the medical home derived from parental perception and practice-level assessment of the medical home.

METHODS

Thirty parents at each of 6 Boston-area community health centers (CHCs) were administered the 19-question medical home measure of the 2011 National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH). Each CHC was scored in accordance with the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) 2011 Patient-Centered Medical Home Standards and Guidelines. Bivariate analysis of the independent variables against the dependent variable (the NCQA measure, assessed as both a continuous score and a categorical tier) was performed. Linear and logistical regression models accounting for the cluster design were then constructed, with the NSCH measure as the primary predictor.

RESULTS

Of the 180 parents, 52% had a medical home according to the NSCH criteria. Of the 6 CHCs, 5 were a medical home according to the NCQA Standards (2 at Tier 3, 3 at Tier 2). Regression modeling demonstrated nonsignificant associations between both the continuous and categorical (tier) NCQA scores and the NSCH assessment of the medical home, with a β of -2.80 (95% confidence interval, -7.75 to 13.35) and an adjusted odds ratio of 2.17 (95% confidence interval, 0.82 to 5.74), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant association between the individual-level and practice-level assessments of the medical home. Given this discrepancy, our results suggest that we may need to temper our expectations that the medical home transformation currently being implemented at the practice level will lead to the child health and health care utilization outcomes extensively demonstrated in the literature.

摘要

目的

确定源自父母感知和实践水平评估的医疗之家的广泛使用的个体水平评估与医疗之家之间的关联。

方法

在波士顿地区的 6 个社区卫生中心(CHC)中的每个中心,对 30 名父母进行了 2011 年全国儿童健康调查(NSCH)的 19 个问题医疗家庭测量。每个 CHC 均根据国家质量保证委员会(NCQA)的 2011 年以患者为中心的医疗之家标准和指南进行评分。对独立变量与因变量(NCQA 措施,评估为连续评分和分类等级)进行了双变量分析。然后,构建了线性和逻辑回归模型,这些模型考虑了群集设计,并将 NSCH 措施作为主要预测指标。

结果

在 180 名父母中,根据 NSCH 标准,有 52%的人拥有医疗之家。在 6 个 CHC 中,有 5 个根据 NCQA 标准(3 个 3 级,3 个 2 级)是医疗之家。回归模型表明,连续和分类(等级)NCQA 评分与 NSCH 对医疗之家的评估之间均无显著关联,β值分别为-2.80(95%置信区间,-7.75 至 13.35)和调整后的优势比为 2.17(95%置信区间,0.82 至 5.74)。

结论

个体水平和实践水平评估之间没有显著关联。鉴于这种差异,我们的研究结果表明,我们可能需要调整我们的期望,即在实践层面上实施的医疗之家转型将带来广泛的儿童健康和医疗保健利用成果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验