Foreman Brandon, Westwood Andrew J, Claassen Jan, Bazil Carl W
Divisions of *Neurocritical Care and †Epilepsy and Sleep Disorders, Neurological Institute of New York, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, U.S.A.
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Feb;32(1):66-74. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000110.
Sleep deprivation may be particularly detrimental to intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Polysomnography has demonstrated abnormal sleep in medical and surgical ICU populations. Both environmental factors and circadian disruption have been implicated. We hypothesized that patients in a neurologic ICU would demonstrate similar sleep disturbances and that a combination of sleep-promoting interventions would increase sleep time.
Twelve patients were enrolled in this pilot-randomized, controlled, study in a neurologic ICU. For adult patients undergoing continuous EEG for clinical purposes, noise-cancelling headphones and eye masks were worn, and an oral dose of melatonin was administered for 3 days, or until EEG was stopped. Sleep was scored according to standard criteria; EEG was characterized and analyzed quantitatively.
Sixty-five percent of the patients' recordings were unscorable based on accepted standardized criteria; therefore, sleep measures could not be compared. For those with sleep that could be scored, total sleep time was normal, although sleep was fragmented and time spent in slow-wave or rapid eye movement sleep was notably decreased. Patients with unscorable recordings had worse injury severity measures, absent or significantly slower posterior dominant rhythm, and less coherence of posterior faster frequencies. Clinical outcomes were similar between intervention and control groups.
Although sleep-promoting interventions were feasible, sleep quantification based on currently accepted criteria limited the ability to score sleep. Similar to other ICUs, sleep in the neurologic ICU is abnormal; patients with unscorable sleep-like states have greater injury severity. This study was limited by strict enrollment criteria. A reliable method to quantify sleep and sleep-like states in the ICU is needed.
睡眠剥夺可能对重症监护病房(ICU)患者尤其有害。多导睡眠图已显示,在内科和外科ICU患者群体中存在睡眠异常。环境因素和昼夜节律紊乱都被认为与之有关。我们假设神经ICU中的患者会表现出类似的睡眠障碍,并且促进睡眠干预措施的组合会增加睡眠时间。
12名患者被纳入这项在神经ICU进行的试点随机对照研究。对于因临床目的接受持续脑电图监测的成年患者,佩戴降噪耳机和眼罩,并口服褪黑素3天,或直至脑电图监测停止。根据标准对睡眠进行评分;对脑电图进行定性和定量分析。
根据公认的标准化标准,65%的患者记录无法评分;因此,无法比较睡眠指标。对于那些睡眠可评分的患者,尽管睡眠碎片化,且慢波或快速眼动睡眠时长显著减少,但总睡眠时间正常。记录无法评分的患者损伤严重程度指标更差,枕后优势节律缺失或明显减慢,枕部较快频率的连贯性更低。干预组和对照组的临床结局相似。
尽管促进睡眠的干预措施可行,但基于目前公认标准的睡眠量化限制了睡眠评分能力。与其他ICU类似,神经ICU中的睡眠是异常的;睡眠样状态无法评分的患者损伤严重程度更高。本研究受严格入选标准限制。需要一种可靠的方法来量化ICU中的睡眠和睡眠样状态。