Lewis Stephen L, Porceddu Sandro, Nakamura Naoki, Palma David A, Lo Simon S, Hoskin Peter, Moghanaki Drew, Chmura Steven J, Salama Joseph K
*Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC †Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Qld, Australia ‡Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Akashicho, Chuouku, Tokyo, Japan §London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada ∥Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH ¶Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK #Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA **Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Am J Clin Oncol. 2017 Aug;40(4):418-422. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000169.
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is often used to treat patients with oligometastases (OM). Yet, patterns of SBRT practice for OM are unknown. Therefore, we surveyed radiation oncologists internationally, to understand how and when SBRT is used for OM.
A 25-question survey was distributed to radiation oncologists. Respondents using SBRT for OM were asked how long they have been treating OM, number of patients treated, organs treated, primary reason for use, doses used, and future intentions. Respondents not using SBRT for OM were asked reasons why SBRT was not used and intentions for future adoption. Data were analyzed anonymously.
We received 1007 surveys from 43 countries. Eighty-three percent began using SBRT after 2005 and greater than one third after 2010. Eighty-four percent cited perceived treatment response/durability as the primary reason for using SBRT in OM patients. Commonly treated organs were lung (90%), liver (75%), and spine (70%). SBRT dose/fractionation schemes varied widely. Most would offer a second course to new OM. Nearly all (99%) planned to continue and 66% planned to increase SBRT for OM. Of those not using SBRT, 59% plan to start soon. The most common reason for not using SBRT was lack of clinical efficacy (48%) or lack of necessary image guidance equipment (34%).
Radiation oncologists are increasingly using SBRT for OM. The main reason for not using SBRT for OM is a perceived lack of evidence demonstrating clinical advantages. These data strengthen the need for robust prospective clinical trials (ongoing and in development) to demonstrate clinical efficacy given the widespread adoption of SBRT for OM.
立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)常用于治疗寡转移(OM)患者。然而,OM的SBRT应用模式尚不清楚。因此,我们对国际范围内的放射肿瘤学家进行了调查,以了解SBRT用于OM的方式和时机。
向放射肿瘤学家发放了一份包含25个问题的调查问卷。对于使用SBRT治疗OM的受访者,询问了他们治疗OM的时长、治疗的患者数量、治疗的器官、使用的主要原因、使用的剂量以及未来的意向。对于未使用SBRT治疗OM的受访者,询问了不使用SBRT的原因以及未来采用的意向。数据进行了匿名分析。
我们收到了来自43个国家的1007份调查问卷。83%的人在2005年后开始使用SBRT,超过三分之一的人在2010年后开始使用。84%的人认为治疗反应/持久性是在OM患者中使用SBRT的主要原因。常见的治疗器官是肺(90%)、肝(75%)和脊柱(70%)。SBRT的剂量/分割方案差异很大。大多数人会为新的OM患者提供第二个疗程。几乎所有(99%)人计划继续使用,66%的人计划增加SBRT用于OM治疗。在未使用SBRT的人中,59%计划不久后开始使用。不使用SBRT的最常见原因是缺乏临床疗效(48%)或缺乏必要的图像引导设备(34%)。
放射肿瘤学家越来越多地将SBRT用于OM治疗。不使用SBRT治疗OM的主要原因是认为缺乏证据证明其临床优势。鉴于SBRT在OM治疗中的广泛应用,这些数据强化了进行强有力的前瞻性临床试验(正在进行和正在开展)以证明临床疗效的必要性。