Suppr超能文献

卡培他滨联合长春瑞滨序贯多西他赛与阿霉素联合环磷酰胺序贯多西他赛作为乳腺癌新辅助化疗的随机II期试验。

A Randomized Phase II Trial of Capecitabine Plus Vinorelbine Followed by Docetaxel Versus Adriamycin Plus Cyclophosphamide Followed by Docetaxel as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer.

作者信息

Yoo Changhoon, Kim Sung-Bae, Ahn Jin-Hee, Kim Jeong Eun, Jung Kyung Hae, Gong Gyung-Yub, Son Byung-Ho, Ahn Sei-Hyun, Ahn Seung Do, Kim Hak-Hee, Shin Hee Jung, Kim Woo Kun

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Jul;47(3):406-15. doi: 10.4143/crt.2014.073. Epub 2014 Nov 24.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Given the promising activity of capecitabine and vinorelbine in metastatic breast cancer, this randomized phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of this combination as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with operable breast cancer (n=75) were randomly assigned to receive either four cycles of adriamycin 60 mg/m(2) plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks followed by four cycles of docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks (AC-D) or four cycles of capecitabine 2,000 mg/m(2) (day 1-14) plus vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8) every 3 weeks followed by four cycles of docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) (CV-D). The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR) in the primary breast (ypT0/is).

RESULTS

Most patients (84%) had locally advanced (n=41) or inflammatory breast cancer (n=22). pCR rates in the primary breast were 15% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7% to 30%) and 11% (95% CI, 4% to 26%) in the AC-D and CV-D groups, respectively. The overall response rates and 5-year progression-free survival rates in the AC-D and CV-D groups were 62% and 64%, and 51.3% (95% CI, 34.6% to 68.0%) and 30.2% (95% CI, 13.3% to 47.1%), respectively. Although both regimens were well tolerated, CV-D showed less frequent grade 3-4 neutropenia and vomiting than AC-D, whereas manageable diarrhea and hand-foot syndrome were more common in the CV-D group.

CONCLUSION

CV-D is a feasible and active non-anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for breast cancer.

摘要

目的

鉴于卡培他滨和长春瑞滨在转移性乳腺癌中显示出有前景的活性,本随机II期试验评估了该联合方案作为乳腺癌新辅助化疗的疗效和安全性。

材料与方法

可手术乳腺癌患者(n = 75)被随机分配接受以下治疗:每3周一次,共四个周期的阿霉素60 mg/m²加环磷酰胺600 mg/m²,随后每3周一次,共四个周期的多西他赛75 mg/m²(AC-D组);或每3周一次,共四个周期的卡培他滨2000 mg/m²(第1 - 14天)加长春瑞滨25 mg/m²(第1天和第8天),随后每3周一次,共四个周期的多西他赛75 mg/m²(CV-D组)。主要终点是原发乳腺的病理完全缓解(pCR,ypT0/is)。

结果

大多数患者(84%)患有局部晚期(n = 41)或炎性乳腺癌(n = 22)。AC-D组和CV-D组原发乳腺的pCR率分别为15%(95%置信区间[CI],7%至30%)和11%(95%CI,4%至26%)。AC-D组和CV-D组的总缓解率和5年无进展生存率分别为62%和64%,以及51.3%(95%CI,34.6%至68.0%)和30.2%(95%CI,13.3%至47.1%)。虽然两种方案耐受性均良好,但CV-D组3 - 4级中性粒细胞减少和呕吐的发生率低于AC-D组,而可控性腹泻和手足综合征在CV-D组更为常见。

结论

CV-D是一种可行且有效的非蒽环类乳腺癌新辅助化疗方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf31/4506113/d8df5a79b7b2/crt-2014-073f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验