Gallagher Ann, Bousso Regina Szylit, McCarthy Joan, Kohlen Helen, Andrews Tom, Paganini Maria Cristina, Abu-El-Noor Nasser Ibrahim, Cox Anna, Haas Margit, Arber Anne, Abu-El-Noor Mysoon Khalil, Baliza Michelle Freire, Padilha Katia Grillo
University of Surrey, UK.
University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Apr;52(4):794-803. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.12.003. Epub 2015 Jan 3.
Intensive care units (ICUs) focus on treatment for those who are critically ill and interventions to prolong life. Ethical issues arise when decisions have to be made regarding the withdrawal and withholding of life-sustaining treatment and the shift to comfort and palliative care. These issues are particularly challenging for nurses when there are varying degrees of uncertainty regarding prognosis. Little is known about nurses' end-of-life (EoL) decision-making practice across cultures.
To understand nurses' EoL decision-making practices in ICUs in different cultural contexts.
We collected and analysed qualitative data using Grounded Theory.
Interviews were conducted with experienced ICU nurses in university or hospital premises in five countries: Brazil, England, Germany, Ireland and Palestine.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 51 nurses (10 in Brazil, 9 in England, 10 in Germany, 10 in Ireland and 12 nurses in Palestine). They were purposefully and theoretically selected to include nurses having a variety of characteristics and experiences concerning end-of-life (EoL) decision-making.
The study used grounded theory to inform data collection and analysis. Interviews were facilitated by using key questions. The comparative analysis of the data within and across data generated by the different research teams enabled researchers to develop a deeper understanding of EoL decision-making practices in the ICU. Ethical approval was granted in each of the participating countries and voluntary informed consent obtained from each participant.
The core category that emerged was 'negotiated reorienting'. Whilst nurses do not make the 'ultimate' EoL decisions, they engage in two core practices: consensus seeking (involving coaxing, information cuing and voice enabling); and emotional holding (creating time-space and comfort giving).
There was consensus regarding the core concept and core practices employed by nurses in the ICUs in the five countries. However, there were some discernible differences regarding the power dynamics in nurse-doctor relationships, particularly in relation to the cultural perspectives on death and dying and in the development of palliative care. The research suggests the need for culturally sensitive ethics education and bereavement support in different cultural contexts.
重症监护病房(ICU)专注于对危重症患者的治疗以及延长生命的干预措施。当必须就撤除和停止维持生命的治疗以及转向舒适和姑息治疗做出决策时,伦理问题就会出现。当预后存在不同程度的不确定性时,这些问题对护士来说尤其具有挑战性。关于不同文化背景下护士的临终(EoL)决策实践,人们了解甚少。
了解不同文化背景下ICU护士的临终决策实践。
我们使用扎根理论收集和分析定性数据。
在巴西、英国、德国、爱尔兰和巴勒斯坦五个国家的大学或医院场所,对经验丰富的ICU护士进行了访谈。
对51名护士进行了半结构化访谈(巴西10名,英国9名,德国10名,爱尔兰10名,巴勒斯坦12名)。他们是经过有目的的理论性挑选的,以纳入在临终(EoL)决策方面具有各种特征和经验的护士。
本研究采用扎根理论指导数据收集和分析。通过关键问题促进访谈。不同研究团队生成的数据内部和跨数据的比较分析使研究人员能够更深入地了解ICU中的临终决策实践。每个参与国都获得了伦理批准,并从每位参与者那里获得了自愿知情同意。
出现的核心类别是“协商性重新定位”。虽然护士不做出“最终”的临终决策,但他们参与两种核心实践:寻求共识(包括哄劝、提供信息提示和赋予发言权);以及情感维系(创造时空并给予安慰)。
五个国家ICU护士所采用的核心概念和核心实践存在共识。然而,在护士与医生关系中的权力动态方面存在一些明显差异,特别是在关于死亡和临终的文化观念以及姑息治疗的发展方面。该研究表明在不同文化背景下需要开展具有文化敏感性的伦理教育和丧亲支持。