Moss Antony C, Erskine James A K, Albery Ian P, Allen James Richard, Georgiou George J
Department of Psychology, School of Applied Sciences, London South Bank University, 103 Borough Road, London SE1 0AA, United Kingdom.
Division of Population Health Sciences and Education, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, United Kingdom.
Addict Behav. 2015 May;44:65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.01.029. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
Research to understand how individuals cope with intrusive negative or threatening thoughts suggests a variety of different cognitive strategies aimed at thought control. In this review, two of these strategies--thought suppression and repressive coping--are discussed in the context of addictive behaviour. Thought suppression involves conscious, volitional attempts to expel a thought from awareness, whereas repressive coping, which involves the avoidance of thoughts without the corresponding conscious intention, appears to be a far more automated process. Whilst there has been an emerging body of research exploring the role of thought suppression in addictive behaviour, there remains a dearth of research which has considered the role of repressive coping in the development of, and recovery from, addiction. Based on a review of the literature, and a discussion of the supposed mechanisms which underpin these strategies for exercising mental control, a conceptual model is proposed which posits a potential common mechanism. This model makes a number of predictions which require exploration in future research to fully understand the cognitive strategies utilised by individuals to control intrusive thoughts related to their addictive behaviour.
旨在了解个体如何应对侵入性负面或威胁性想法的研究表明,存在多种旨在控制思维的不同认知策略。在本综述中,将在成瘾行为的背景下讨论其中两种策略——思维抑制和压抑应对。思维抑制涉及有意识、有意志地试图将一种想法从意识中驱除,而压抑应对则涉及在没有相应有意识意图的情况下避免想法,这似乎是一个更为自动的过程。虽然已有越来越多的研究探讨思维抑制在成瘾行为中的作用,但仍缺乏研究考虑压抑应对在成瘾发展及康复过程中的作用。基于对文献的综述以及对支撑这些心理控制策略的假定机制的讨论,提出了一个概念模型,该模型假定存在一种潜在的共同机制。该模型做出了一些预测,需要在未来研究中进行探索,以充分了解个体用于控制与成瘾行为相关的侵入性想法的认知策略。